Table 3 Results of hypothesised... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Results of hypothesised relationships

Hypotheses	Std estimates	S.E	Sig.	Support
H1: Performance expectancy → Continuance intention	0.173	0.060	0.004	Yes
H2: Performance expectancy → User satisfaction	0.520	0.094	0.000	Yes
H3: Social influence → User satisfaction	−0.019	0.047	0.872	No
H4: Confirmation → User satisfaction	0.218	0.033	0.080	Yes
H5: User satisfaction → Continuance intention	0.350	0.072	0.000	Yes
H6: Perceived value → User satisfaction	0.259	0.062	0.034	Yes
H7: Perceived value → Continuance intention	0.173	0.050	0.150	No
H8: User satisfaction/Perceived value → Continuance intention

Hypotheses	Std estimates	S.E	Sig.	Support
H1: Performance expectancy → Continuance intention	0.173	0.060	0.004	Yes
H2: Performance expectancy → User satisfaction	0.520	0.094	0.000	Yes
H3: Social influence → User satisfaction	−0.019	0.047	0.872	No
H4: Confirmation → User satisfaction	0.218	0.033	0.080	Yes
H5: User satisfaction → Continuance intention	0.350	0.072	0.000	Yes
H6: Perceived value → User satisfaction	0.259	0.062	0.034	Yes
H7: Perceived value → Continuance intention	0.173	0.050	0.150	No
H8: User satisfaction/Perceived value → Continuance intention

Mediating path coefficient and std. error				Sobel test from Hayes macro process
Mediator path	Coefficient	Std. error	Effect	Test statistic (Z)	Std. error	p-value	Support
US $\to$ PV	0.49	0.04	0.13	4.50	0.03	0.000	Partial mediation support
US $\to$ CI	0.59	0.04
US/PV $\to$ CI	0.46	0.04

Mediating path coefficient and std. error				Sobel test from Hayes macro process
Mediator path	Coefficient	Std. error	Effect	Test statistic (Z)	Std. error	p-value	Support
US $\to$ PV	0.49	0.04	0.13	4.50	0.03	0.000	Partial mediation support
US $\to$ CI	0.59	0.04
US/PV $\to$ CI	0.46	0.04

Note(s): SE = Standard error; *** = p < 0.0000; ** = p < 0.05; * = p < 0.1; n.s = not significant