Findings
| Themes | Main categories | Subcategories | Emerging concepts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value differences | Influencers | Self-promotion | Leaders = awareness of impacts; influencers concerned about product/image Leaders gain followers by sharing morals and values, while influencers gain followers by the content they post |
| Leaders | Moral/ethical causes | An influencer is not a leader by default but can become a leader through certain causes/morals An influencer could be a leader if their platforms are positively utilized | |
| Prosocial behaviors of leaders | Influencers can be leaders but are often managed by other people, whereas leaders give directions Influencers can turn to a leader if they allow the voices of their followers to be heard | ||
| Engagement | Active | Working with leaders | Followers are more actively engaged with the leader than fans with the influencers Fans may not practice the values of an influencer, but followers operate with a shared purpose |
| Passive | Admiration | Fans just admire the influencers, while followers are committed to achieving the group's goals Fans = following an entity; followers are seeking someone to lead them | |
| Consuming Content | Fans only consume media content, but followers are committed to the group's goals Fans only consume content without engaging in any form of leadership, but followers have someone who is leading them | ||
| Degree of responsibility | Influencers are responsible | Awareness of power and influence | Influencers can hold their fans/followers accountable for their actions. There is a “social responsibility” with being an influencer and words used Influencers must be aware of their power and take responsibility for followers’ words/actions |
| Influencers are not responsible | Individual responsibility of followers | Leaders have control over their followers, and while influencers cannot necessarily control what the follower does, they can't be held responsible for the action and inaction of the followers Influencers are not responsible for the words/actions of followers but can “influence” as role models through online platforms |
| Themes | Main categories | Subcategories | Emerging concepts |
|---|---|---|---|
| Value differences | Leaders = awareness of impacts; influencers concerned about product/image | ||
| An influencer is not a leader by default but can become a leader through certain causes/morals | |||
| Influencers can be leaders but are often managed by other people, whereas leaders give directions | |||
| Engagement | Followers are more actively engaged with the leader than fans with the influencers | ||
| Fans just admire the influencers, while followers are committed to achieving the group's goals | |||
| Fans only consume media content, but followers are committed to the group's goals | |||
| Degree of responsibility | Influencers can hold their fans/followers accountable for their actions. | ||
| Leaders have control over their followers, and while influencers cannot necessarily control what the follower does, they can't be held responsible for the action and inaction of the followers |
Note(s): The table shows the thematic analysis from students' discussion posts, three broad themes emerged, with six main categories, two from each broad theme with eight subcategories. The emerging concepts which include excerpts from students' responses give a broader explanation of the subcategories
Source(s): Table by authors
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.