Robustness tests- propensity score matching (PSM) analysis
| Panel A: First-stage propensity score matching | |
|---|---|
| Ln_TA | −0.1537*** |
| (0.0062) | |
| Leverage | −0.6144*** |
| (0.0490) | |
| ROA | −1.6750*** |
| (0.0784) | |
| MTB | 0.0196*** |
| (0.0009) | |
| TANG | 1.6850*** |
| (0.0779) | |
| Sales_Growth | 0.0183*** |
| (0.0043) | |
| Capex | −5.6543*** |
| (0.2071) | |
| B_Size | −0.0925*** |
| (0.0087) | |
| B_Gender_Div | 0.0315*** |
| (0.0022) | |
| CEO_Dual | −0.3073*** |
| (0.0414) | |
| CG | −0.0113*** |
| (0.0009) | |
| Audit_Com | −0.3182*** |
| (0.1153) | |
| Audit_Tenure | 0.0046*** |
| (0.0018) | |
| Int_Intensity | −0.0456 |
| (0.0534) | |
| Constant | 3.0051*** |
| (0.1441) | |
| Y/F/I/S FE | Yes |
| Observations | 34,021 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.1968 |
| Panel A: First-stage propensity score matching | |
|---|---|
| Ln_TA | −0.1537*** |
| (0.0062) | |
| Leverage | −0.6144*** |
| (0.0490) | |
| ROA | −1.6750*** |
| (0.0784) | |
| MTB | 0.0196*** |
| (0.0009) | |
| TANG | 1.6850*** |
| (0.0779) | |
| Sales_Growth | 0.0183*** |
| (0.0043) | |
| Capex | −5.6543*** |
| (0.2071) | |
| B_Size | −0.0925*** |
| (0.0087) | |
| B_Gender_Div | 0.0315*** |
| (0.0022) | |
| CEO_Dual | −0.3073*** |
| (0.0414) | |
| CG | −0.0113*** |
| (0.0009) | |
| Audit_Com | −0.3182*** |
| (0.1153) | |
| Audit_Tenure | 0.0046*** |
| (0.0018) | |
| Int_Intensity | −0.0456 |
| (0.0534) | |
| Constant | 3.0051*** |
| (0.1441) | |
| Y/F/I/S FE | Yes |
| Observations | 34,021 |
| Adjusted | 0.1968 |
| Panel B: Second stage regression | |
|---|---|
| DAQ | |
| Fitted_zCULTURE | −0.0014** |
| (0.0007) | |
| Constant | 0.0704*** |
| (0.0039) | |
| Y/F/I/S FE | Yes |
| Observations | 25,624 |
| Adjusted R2 | 0.1368 |
| Panel B: Second stage regression | |
|---|---|
| DAQ | |
| Fitted_zCULTURE | −0.0014** |
| (0.0007) | |
| Constant | 0.0704*** |
| (0.0039) | |
| Y/F/I/S FE | Yes |
| Observations | 25,624 |
| Adjusted | 0.1368 |
Note(s): This table reports robustness tests using propensity score matching (PSM). Panel A presents the first-stage logistic regression estimating the likelihood of a firm being classified as high-culture based on firm, financial, and governance characteristics. Panel B shows the second-stage regression of discretionary accruals quality (DAQ) on the PSM-adjusted culture score. Standard errors in parentheses. *, **, and *** denote 10%, 5%, and 1% significance, respectively. All models include year, firm, industry, and state fixed effects
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.