Table 9

Robustness tests- propensity score matching (PSM) analysis

Panel A: First-stage propensity score matching
Ln_TA−0.1537***
(0.0062)
Leverage−0.6144***
(0.0490)
ROA−1.6750***
(0.0784)
MTB0.0196***
(0.0009)
TANG1.6850***
(0.0779)
Sales_Growth0.0183***
(0.0043)
Capex−5.6543***
(0.2071)
B_Size−0.0925***
(0.0087)
B_Gender_Div0.0315***
(0.0022)
CEO_Dual−0.3073***
(0.0414)
CG−0.0113***
(0.0009)
Audit_Com−0.3182***
(0.1153)
Audit_Tenure0.0046***
(0.0018)
Int_Intensity−0.0456
(0.0534)
Constant3.0051***
(0.1441)
Y/F/I/S FEYes
Observations34,021
Adjusted R20.1968
Panel B: Second stage regression
DAQ
Fitted_zCULTURE−0.0014**
(0.0007)
Constant0.0704***
(0.0039)
Y/F/I/S FEYes
Observations25,624
Adjusted R20.1368

Note(s): This table reports robustness tests using propensity score matching (PSM). Panel A presents the first-stage logistic regression estimating the likelihood of a firm being classified as high-culture based on firm, financial, and governance characteristics. Panel B shows the second-stage regression of discretionary accruals quality (DAQ) on the PSM-adjusted culture score. Standard errors in parentheses. *, **, and *** denote 10%, 5%, and 1% significance, respectively. All models include year, firm, industry, and state fixed effects

Source(s): The authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options