Discriminant validity assessment using HTMT
| Construct | IS | AAP | FR | PR | CA |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional support (IS) | |||||
| Adaptive agricultural practices (AAP) | 0.731 | ||||
| Financial resilience (FR) | 0.655 | 0.538 | |||
| Psychological resilience (PR) | 0.512 | 0.491 | 0.603 | ||
| Climate adaptability (CA) | 0.564 | 0.620 | 0.708 | 0.695 | |
| Construct | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Institutional support ( | |||||
| Adaptive agricultural practices ( | 0.731 | ||||
| Financial resilience ( | 0.655 | 0.538 | |||
| Psychological resilience ( | 0.512 | 0.491 | 0.603 | ||
| Climate adaptability ( | 0.564 | 0.620 | 0.708 | 0.695 | |
All values are below the conservative threshold of 0.85, providing strong evidence for discriminant validity
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.