Table 14. Evaluating differences in the... | Emerald Publishing

Table 14.

Evaluating differences in the impact of university organisational type

Hypotheses		x2	$χ^{2}$ /df	CFI	RMSEA	Estimate	Δx2(Δdf)	ρ	Empirical evidence
EP → EE	Public	17.541	1.349	0.995	0.034	0.515**	35.056 (6)	0.176	Unsupported
EP → EE	Private	52.597	2.768	0.934	0.092	0.026**	35.056 (6)	0.176	Unsupported
EP → US	Public	40.537	3.118	0.972	0.085	0.676**	29.799 (1)	0.217	Unsupported
EP → US	Private	10.738	1.342	0.986	0.040	0.053	29.799 (1)	0.217	Unsupported
EP → C	Public	27.220	3.402	0.973	0.090	0.495**	16.007 (1)	0.191	Unsupported
EP → C	Private	11.213	1.402	0.981	0.044	0.108	16.007 (1)	0.191	Unsupported
EE → EI	Public	46.976	1.807	0.984	0.052	0.635**	132.474 (1)	0.007***	Supported
EE → EI	Private	179.45	6.646	0.718	0.164	0.009	132.474 (1)	0.007***	Supported

Hypotheses		x2	$χ^{2}$ /df	CFI	RMSEA	Estimate	Δx2(Δdf)	ρ	Empirical evidence
EP → EE	Public	17.541	1.349	0.995	0.034	0.515**	35.056 (6)	0.176	Unsupported
EP → EE	Private	52.597	2.768	0.934	0.092	0.026**	35.056 (6)	0.176	Unsupported
EP → US	Public	40.537	3.118	0.972	0.085	0.676**	29.799 (1)	0.217	Unsupported
EP → US	Private	10.738	1.342	0.986	0.040	0.053	29.799 (1)	0.217	Unsupported
EP → C	Public	27.220	3.402	0.973	0.090	0.495**	16.007 (1)	0.191	Unsupported
EP → C	Private	11.213	1.402	0.981	0.044	0.108	16.007 (1)	0.191	Unsupported
EE → EI	Public	46.976	1.807	0.984	0.052	0.635**	132.474 (1)	0.007***	Supported
EE → EI	Private	179.45	6.646	0.718	0.164	0.009	132.474 (1)	0.007***	Supported

Note(s):

** ρ < 0.001, *** ρ < 0.01

Source(s): By author