Table 2 Configurations leading to... | Emerald Publishing

Table 2

Configurations leading to non-recovery

Condition	Conf. 1	Conf. 2	Conf. 3	Conf. 4	Conf. 5	Conf. 6	Conf. 7	Conf. 8	Conf. 9	Conf. 10
fsExploitation	●	●		●	●		⊗			●
fsExploration			•	⊗	⊗		⊗	⊗	⊗	•
Big		⊗	⊗		⊗	⊗	⊗	●	⊗
Old	•	●	⊗	•		•	⊗	•	•	⊗
FIM				⊗		⊗	⊗	⊗	●	⊗
First generation	⊗		⊗		•	•		⊗	⊗	•
raw coverage	0.44	0.44	0.21	0.23	0.08	0.07	0.16	0.12	0.11	0.07
unique coverage	0.06	0.01	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.01
consistency	0.89	0.91	0.86	0.92	0.88	0.84	0.87	0.87	0.89	0.89
solution coverage	0.64
solution consistency	0.85

Condition	Conf. 1	Conf. 2	Conf. 3	Conf. 4	Conf. 5	Conf. 6	Conf. 7	Conf. 8	Conf. 9	Conf. 10
fsExploitation	●	●		●	●		⊗			●
fsExploration			•	⊗	⊗		⊗	⊗	⊗	•
Big		⊗	⊗		⊗	⊗	⊗	●	⊗
Old	•	●	⊗	•		•	⊗	•	•	⊗
FIM				⊗		⊗	⊗	⊗	●	⊗
First generation	⊗		⊗		•	•		⊗	⊗	•
raw coverage	0.44	0.44	0.21	0.23	0.08	0.07	0.16	0.12	0.11	0.07
unique coverage	0.06	0.01	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.00	0.01	0.01	0.02	0.01
consistency	0.89	0.91	0.86	0.92	0.88	0.84	0.87	0.87	0.89	0.89
solution coverage	0.64
solution consistency	0.85

Note(s): ● = core causal condition (present); ⊗ = core causal condition (absent)

• = contributing causal condition (present); ⊗ = contributing causal condition (absent)

Source(s): Table by authors