Applying Keller’s ARCS Model to Online Learning
| ARCS Component | Strategy | Potential Area of Application |
|---|---|---|
| Attention | Include activities and assignments that require frequent interaction | Discussion/assignments |
| Include visual elements such as videos | Lecture | |
| Utilize simulations | Assignments | |
| Vary the style of instruction (font, graphics, etc.) | Lecture | |
| Encourage debate | Discussion | |
| Introduce incongruity | Lecture | |
| Allow students to ask questions of each other | Discussion | |
| Use questions to peek curiosity | Discussion | |
| Incorporate humor | Lecture/personal correspondence | |
| Relevance | Base curriculum on real world issues/scenarios | Lecture |
| Target content to the learner’s needs | Lecture | |
| Have student’s make link between course materials and future goals | Discussion | |
| Outline objectives | Lecture | |
| Allow topic choices in activities | Activities | |
| Implement group work | Activities | |
| Use student experiences | Discussion | |
| Use personal pronouns and student names | Personal correspondence | |
| Provide supplemental information/links | Lecture | |
| Use guest speaker | Lecture | |
| Confidence | Use a visual appealing professional design to give credibility | Lecture |
| Utilize a simple interface | Lecture | |
| Include practice questions/reviews | Activities | |
| Provide grading rubrics | Activities | |
| Establish realistic expectations about requirements for success | Personal correspondence | |
| Scaffold the course appropriately | Course design | |
| Identify areas of problematic concern | Personal correspondence | |
| Allow students to explain their strengths or areas of expertise | Discussion | |
| Make content challenging but achievable | Course design | |
| Allow learner to control pace and sequencing | Lecture | |
| Satisfaction | Provide supportive feedback | Personal correspondence |
| Reinforce and provide praise | Personal correspondence | |
| Allow hands-on practice | Activities |
| ARCS Component | Strategy | Potential Area of Application |
|---|---|---|
| Attention | Include activities and assignments that require frequent interaction | Discussion/assignments |
| Include visual elements such as videos | Lecture | |
| Utilize simulations | Assignments | |
| Vary the style of instruction (font, graphics, etc.) | Lecture | |
| Encourage debate | Discussion | |
| Introduce incongruity | Lecture | |
| Allow students to ask questions of each other | Discussion | |
| Use questions to peek curiosity | Discussion | |
| Incorporate humor | Lecture/personal correspondence | |
| Relevance | Base curriculum on real world issues/scenarios | Lecture |
| Target content to the learner’s needs | Lecture | |
| Have student’s make link between course materials and future goals | Discussion | |
| Outline objectives | Lecture | |
| Allow topic choices in activities | Activities | |
| Implement group work | Activities | |
| Use student experiences | Discussion | |
| Use personal pronouns and student names | Personal correspondence | |
| Provide supplemental information/links | Lecture | |
| Use guest speaker | Lecture | |
| Confidence | Use a visual appealing professional design to give credibility | Lecture |
| Utilize a simple interface | Lecture | |
| Include practice questions/reviews | Activities | |
| Provide grading rubrics | Activities | |
| Establish realistic expectations about requirements for success | Personal correspondence | |
| Scaffold the course appropriately | Course design | |
| Identify areas of problematic concern | Personal correspondence | |
| Allow students to explain their strengths or areas of expertise | Discussion | |
| Make content challenging but achievable | Course design | |
| Allow learner to control pace and sequencing | Lecture | |
| Satisfaction | Provide supportive feedback | Personal correspondence |
| Reinforce and provide praise | Personal correspondence | |
| Allow hands-on practice | Activities |
Sources:Brennan (2002); Delgran, Vihstadt, and Evans (2015); Huett, Moller, Young, Bray, and Huett (2008); Johnson (2012); Jokelova (2013); Pinchevsky-Font and Dunbar (2015); Schartz, (2014); Taran (2005); Thompson (2016).
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.