Multiple Comparisons: Performance Tukey HSD
| Tukey HSD | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent Variable | (I) Groups | (J) Groups | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | |
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
| Pisa reading score | Group 1 | Group 2 | –1.556 | 9.731 | .986 | –25.86 | 22.74 |
| Group 1 | Group 3 | 37.111* | 9.731 | .002 | 12.81 | 61.41 | |
| Group 2 | Group 3 | 38.667* | 9.731 | .002 | 14.37 | 62.97 | |
| Tukey HSD | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dependent Variable | (I) Groups | (J) Groups | Mean Difference (I-J) | Std. Error | Sig. | 95% Confidence Interval | |
| Lower Bound | Upper Bound | ||||||
| Pisa reading score | Group 1 | Group 2 | –1.556 | 9.731 | .986 | –25.86 | 22.74 |
| Group 1 | Group 3 | 37.111 | 9.731 | .002 | 12.81 | 61.41 | |
| Group 2 | Group 3 | 38.667 | 9.731 | .002 | 14.37 | 62.97 | |
Note: *The mean difference is significant at the 0.05 level.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.