EDLT 592D Videotape Analysis Rubric
| Criteria | Below the Standard 5 Points and Below | Meets the Standard 8–6 Points | Exceeds the Standard 9–10 Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction |
|
|
|
| Verbal communication skills 10% |
|
|
|
| Nonverbal communication skills 10% |
|
|
|
| Management/organization skills 10% |
|
|
|
| Content 50% |
|
|
|
| Writing: Flow of ideas 5% |
|
|
|
| Writing: Grammar and mechanics 5% |
|
|
|
| Criteria | Below the Standard 5 Points and Below | Meets the Standard 8–6 Points | Exceeds the Standard 9–10 Points |
|---|---|---|---|
| Introduction | Neither implicit nor explicit reference is made to the topic or purpose of the narrative. | Readers are aware of the topic of the narrative. | The topic is introduced, and groundwork is laid as to the direction of the narrative. |
| Verbal communication skills 10% | Sections of pertinent content have been omitted or are vague. | All major sections of the pertinent content are included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected. | The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Examples from observation are cited when specific statements are made. |
| Nonverbal communication skills 10% | Sections of pertinent content have been omitted or are vague. | All major sections of the pertinent content are included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected. | The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Examples from observation are cited when specific statements are made. |
| Management/organization skills 10% | Sections of pertinent content have been omitted or are vague. | All major sections of the pertinent content are included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected. | The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Examples from observation are cited when specific statements are made. |
| Content 50% | Sections of pertinent content have been omitted or are vague. | All major sections of the pertinent content are included, but not covered in as much depth, or as explicit, as expected. First section is a description of the teaching session. The second section is an analysis of | The appropriate content in consideration is covered in depth without being redundant. Examples from observation are cited when specific statements are made. First section is a detailed description of the teaching session. The second section is a analysis of |
| Writing: Flow of ideas 5% | The narrative appears to have no direction, with subtopics appearing disjointed. | There is a basic flow from one section to the next, but not all sections or paragraphs follow in a natural or logical order. | The narrative goes from general ideas to specific descriptions. Transitions tie sections together, as well as adjacent paragraphs. |
| Writing: Grammar and mechanics 5% | Inconsistently follows APA Style with numerous errors in any of the following: Grammar Spelling Punctuation Quotations In-text citations Reference list Manuscript guidelines | Follows APA Style with few errors in any of the following: Grammar Spelling Punctuation Quotations In-text citations Reference list Manuscript guidelines | Consistently follows APA Style with minimal errors in any of the following: Grammar Spelling Punctuation Quotations In-text citations Reference list Manuscript guidelines |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.