Posttest Evaluation Means
| Item | N | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | The instructor's communication skills. | 47 | 3.66 | .915 |
| 2. | The clarity with which the class assignments were communicated. | 47 | 3.51 | .777 |
| 3. | The in-person/telephone/email accessibility of the instructor outside of class. | 47 | 3.83 | .868 |
| 4. | The instructor's general level of enthusiasm. | 47 | 4.36 | .792 |
| 5. | The degree to which the types of instructional techniques that were used to teach the class (e.g., lectures, demonstrations, group discussions, case studies, etc.) helped you gain a better understanding of the class material. | 47 | 3.47 | .997 |
| 6. | The instructor's organization and preparation for class. | 47 | 4.02 | .872 |
| 7. | The extent to which the instructor encouraged class participation. | 47 | 3.87 | .900 |
| 8. | The extent to which the instructor made students feel that they were part of the class and "belonged". | 47 | 3.68 | 1.065 |
| 9. | The instructor's professional behavior. | 47 | 4.09 | .855 |
| 10. | The instructor's teaching ability | 47 | 3.74 | .966 |
| 11. | The timeliness with which tests were graded and returned. | 47 | 4.55 | .583 |
| 12. | Overall, this instructor was. | 47 | 3.89 | .961 |
| 13. | The academic rigor of the course. | 47 | 3.85 | .659 |
| 14. | The extent that the content of this course matched the course description provided in the catalog(web or print). | 47 | 3.94 | .845 |
| 15. | The degree to which the selection of topics for this course matched the syllabus. | 47 | 4.23 | .786 |
| 16. | The usefulness of the required textbook(s) to supplement lectures. | 47 | 3.79 | 1.178 |
| 17. | The usefulness of the required CD. | 47 | 3.81 | 1.345 |
| 18. | The selection of topics for this course. | 47 | 4.13 | .824 |
| 19. | The depth that the topics were presented. | 47 | 3.87 | 1.035 |
| 20. | Based on my knowledge of the subject, the extent that the material presented in this course was current with industry standards. | 47 | 4.17 | .702 |
| 21. | The interaction between the instructor and students at the various sites. | 47 | 3.47 | .997 |
| 22. | The promptness with which class materials were delivered/sent to either you or the site | 47 | 4.28 | .800 |
| 23. | The promptness with which a backup tape of a class session was delivered in the even of a broadcast failure or a poor broadcast. | 45 | 3.93 | .986 |
| 24. | The production quality of pre-prepared graphics and PowerPoint slides used for the class. | 47 | 3.91 | .929 |
| 25. | Your reaction to the typical amount of time the pre-prepared graphics (e.g., PowerPoin slides, graphs, tables, pictures, outlines, notes, etc.) were left on the screen for you to understand. | 47 | 4.00 | .780 |
| 26. | The extent to which the room in which the class was held was free of distractions (e.g. noise from adjacent rooms, people coming in and out, other students talking with each other, etc.). | 47 | 4.17 | .963 |
| 27. | The degree to which the facilitator was able to operate the videoconferencing system on the first night of class. | 47 | 4.34 | .867 |
| 28. | The degree to which the facilitator was able to operate the videoconferencing system on the last night of class. | 47 | 4.53 | .620 |
| 29. | The accessibility of the site facilitator. | 47 | 4.62 | .644 |
| 30. | The helpfulness of the site facilitator in distributing materials, handling the technology etc. | 47 | 4.74 | .488 |
| 31. | The effectiveness and reliability of the videoconferencing technology. | 47 | 3.68 | 1.024 |
| 32. | The online interaction tools. (e.g. bulletin boards, chats, etc.) | 47 | 3.00 | .860 |
| 33. | The online organization and presentation of the course. | 47 | 3.74 | .943 |
| 34. | The degree to which the computer-generated graphics and PowerPoint slides helped you gain a better understanding of the course material. | 47 | 3.74 | .846 |
| 35. | The overall effectiveness and reliability of all the technologies employed. | 47 | 3.66 | .867 |
| 36. | Your reaction to the web-based lectures portion of the course. | 47 | 3.43 | 1.211 |
| 37. | Your ability to access a computer when, and if, needed. | 47 | 4.23 | 1.088 |
| 38. | Your ability to access departmental program personnel when needed (i.e., advisors, secretaries). | 47 | 4.57 | .927 |
| 39. | Class enrollment/registration procedures. | 47 | 4.00 | .978 |
| 40. | Your reaction to the present means of material exchange between you and the course instructor. | 47 | 3.83 | 1.007 |
| 41. | Your ability to access a library when, and if, needed. | 47 | 4.09 | .996 |
| 42. | Would you still have been able to take this course if it had not been offered by distance education? (Yes=1/No=2) | 47 | 1.40 | .496 |
| 43. | Your experience with this course, compared to traditional classroom-based courses you have taken in the past. | 47 | 2.70 | 1.413 |
| 44. | The workload required by this course was: | 47 | 3.94 | .673 |
| 45. | Would you enroll in another distance education course? (Yes=1/No=2) | 47 | 1.30 | .462 |
| 46. | Including this course, how many distance education classes have you taken to date? (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7+) | 47 | 1.49 | .748 |
| Item | N | Mean | SD | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1. | The instructor's communication skills. | 47 | 3.66 | .915 |
| 2. | The clarity with which the class assignments were communicated. | 47 | 3.51 | .777 |
| 3. | The in-person/telephone/email accessibility of the instructor outside of class. | 47 | 3.83 | .868 |
| 4. | The instructor's general level of enthusiasm. | 47 | 4.36 | .792 |
| 5. | The degree to which the types of instructional techniques that were used to teach the class (e.g., lectures, demonstrations, group discussions, case studies, etc.) helped you gain a better understanding of the class material. | 47 | 3.47 | .997 |
| 6. | The instructor's organization and preparation for class. | 47 | 4.02 | .872 |
| 7. | The extent to which the instructor encouraged class participation. | 47 | 3.87 | .900 |
| 8. | The extent to which the instructor made students feel that they were part of the class and "belonged". | 47 | 3.68 | 1.065 |
| 9. | The instructor's professional behavior. | 47 | 4.09 | .855 |
| 10. | The instructor's teaching ability | 47 | 3.74 | .966 |
| 11. | The timeliness with which tests were graded and returned. | 47 | 4.55 | .583 |
| 12. | Overall, this instructor was. | 47 | 3.89 | .961 |
| 13. | The academic rigor of the course. | 47 | 3.85 | .659 |
| 14. | The extent that the content of this course matched the course description provided in the catalog(web or print). | 47 | 3.94 | .845 |
| 15. | The degree to which the selection of topics for this course matched the syllabus. | 47 | 4.23 | .786 |
| 16. | The usefulness of the required textbook(s) to supplement lectures. | 47 | 3.79 | 1.178 |
| 17. | The usefulness of the required CD. | 47 | 3.81 | 1.345 |
| 18. | The selection of topics for this course. | 47 | 4.13 | .824 |
| 19. | The depth that the topics were presented. | 47 | 3.87 | 1.035 |
| 20. | Based on my knowledge of the subject, the extent that the material presented in this course was current with industry standards. | 47 | 4.17 | .702 |
| 21. | The interaction between the instructor and students at the various sites. | 47 | 3.47 | .997 |
| 22. | The promptness with which class materials were delivered/sent to either you or the site | 47 | 4.28 | .800 |
| 23. | The promptness with which a backup tape of a class session was delivered in the even of a broadcast failure or a poor broadcast. | 45 | 3.93 | .986 |
| 24. | The production quality of pre-prepared graphics and PowerPoint slides used for the class. | 47 | 3.91 | .929 |
| 25. | Your reaction to the typical amount of time the pre-prepared graphics (e.g., PowerPoin slides, graphs, tables, pictures, outlines, notes, etc.) were left on the screen for you to understand. | 47 | 4.00 | .780 |
| 26. | The extent to which the room in which the class was held was free of distractions (e.g. noise from adjacent rooms, people coming in and out, other students talking with each other, etc.). | 47 | 4.17 | .963 |
| 27. | The degree to which the facilitator was able to operate the videoconferencing system on the first night of class. | 47 | 4.34 | .867 |
| 28. | The degree to which the facilitator was able to operate the videoconferencing system on the last night of class. | 47 | 4.53 | .620 |
| 29. | The accessibility of the site facilitator. | 47 | 4.62 | .644 |
| 30. | The helpfulness of the site facilitator in distributing materials, handling the technology etc. | 47 | 4.74 | .488 |
| 31. | The effectiveness and reliability of the videoconferencing technology. | 47 | 3.68 | 1.024 |
| 32. | The online interaction tools. (e.g. bulletin boards, chats, etc.) | 47 | 3.00 | .860 |
| 33. | The online organization and presentation of the course. | 47 | 3.74 | .943 |
| 34. | The degree to which the computer-generated graphics and PowerPoint slides helped you gain a better understanding of the course material. | 47 | 3.74 | .846 |
| 35. | The overall effectiveness and reliability of all the technologies employed. | 47 | 3.66 | .867 |
| 36. | Your reaction to the web-based lectures portion of the course. | 47 | 3.43 | 1.211 |
| 37. | Your ability to access a computer when, and if, needed. | 47 | 4.23 | 1.088 |
| 38. | Your ability to access departmental program personnel when needed (i.e., advisors, secretaries). | 47 | 4.57 | .927 |
| 39. | Class enrollment/registration procedures. | 47 | 4.00 | .978 |
| 40. | Your reaction to the present means of material exchange between you and the course instructor. | 47 | 3.83 | 1.007 |
| 41. | Your ability to access a library when, and if, needed. | 47 | 4.09 | .996 |
| 42. | Would you still have been able to take this course if it had not been offered by distance education? (Yes=1/No=2) | 47 | 1.40 | .496 |
| 43. | Your experience with this course, compared to traditional classroom-based courses you have taken in the past. | 47 | 2.70 | 1.413 |
| 44. | The workload required by this course was: | 47 | 3.94 | .673 |
| 45. | Would you enroll in another distance education course? (Yes=1/No=2) | 47 | 1.30 | .462 |
| 46. | Including this course, how many distance education classes have you taken to date? (1-2, 3-4, 5-6, 7+) | 47 | 1.49 | .748 |
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Please sign in to your personal account to gift article access.
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Gift articles remaining: --
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses. You may create up to 10 links in a 30 day period.
Gift articles remaining: --
As a benefit of your subscription, you can share temporary access to restricted articles.
Each link will stop working after 30 days or 10 uses.
You have reached the limit of 10 links within a 30 day period.
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.