Table 4 Summary of mediation analyses...

Table 4

Summary of mediation analyses

Testing paths	SE	CI (95%)		β	t-value	Conclusion
Testing paths	SE	Lower bound	Upper bound	β	t-value	Conclusion
Mediation model 1
Path c: “DV: GPITR”
R² = 0.068; F = 3.15^*
IV: SI	0.112	−0.901	0.351	0.130	1.159^n.s.	H1a => not supported
Path a: “DV: GAC”
R² = 0.315; F = 19.66^***
“IV: SI”	0.093	0.186	0.556	0.371	3.978^***
Path b and c´: “DV: GPITR”
R² = 0.124; F = 4.495^**
IV: SI (c´)	0.115	−0.207	0.250	0.021	0.185^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.103	0.087	0.496	0.291	2.826^**
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.028	0.219	0.108		H3a => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.023	0.188	0.092
Mediation model 2
Path c: “DV: GPIPG”
R² = 0.067; F = 3.08^*
IV: SI	0.123	0.472	0.535	0.291	2.361^*	H1b => supported
Path b and c´: “DV: GPIPG”
R² = 0.173; F = 6.66^***
IV: SI (c´)	0.123	−0.118	0.370	0.125	1.017^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.110	0.227	0.664	0.445	4.037^***
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.053	0.293	0.165		H3b => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.039	0.232	0.128
Mediation model 3
Path c: “DV: GPIWB”
R² = 0.145; F = 7.275^***
IV: SI	0.121	−0.147	0.332	0.092	0.765^n.s.	H1c => not supported
Path b and c´: “DV: GPIWB”
R² = 0.269; F = 11.73^***
IV: SI (c´)	0.119	−0.326	0.144	−0.091	−0.763^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.106	0.283	0.704	0.494	4.647^***
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.068	0.323	0.183		H3c => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.049	0.248	0.138
Mediation model 4
Path c: “DV: GSIN”
R² = 0.170; F = 8.769^***
IV: SI	0.134	0.115	0.646	0.381	2.837^**	H2 => supported
Path b and c´: “DV: GSIN”
R² = 0.354; F = 17.45^***
IV: SI (c´)	0.126	−0.120	0.378	0.129	1.025^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.112	0.454	0.900	0.677	6.021^***
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.101	0.421	0.251		H4 => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.064	0.286	0.168

Testing paths	SE	CI (95%)		β	t-value	Conclusion
Testing paths	SE	Lower bound	Upper bound	β	t-value	Conclusion
Mediation model 1
Path c: “DV: GPITR”
R² = 0.068; F = 3.15^*
IV: SI	0.112	−0.901	0.351	0.130	1.159^n.s.	H1a => not supported
Path a: “DV: GAC”
R² = 0.315; F = 19.66^***
“IV: SI”	0.093	0.186	0.556	0.371	3.978^***
Path b and c´: “DV: GPITR”
R² = 0.124; F = 4.495^**
IV: SI (c´)	0.115	−0.207	0.250	0.021	0.185^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.103	0.087	0.496	0.291	2.826^**
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.028	0.219	0.108		H3a => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.023	0.188	0.092
Mediation model 2
Path c: “DV: GPIPG”
R² = 0.067; F = 3.08^*
IV: SI	0.123	0.472	0.535	0.291	2.361^*	H1b => supported
Path b and c´: “DV: GPIPG”
R² = 0.173; F = 6.66^***
IV: SI (c´)	0.123	−0.118	0.370	0.125	1.017^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.110	0.227	0.664	0.445	4.037^***
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.053	0.293	0.165		H3b => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.039	0.232	0.128
Mediation model 3
Path c: “DV: GPIWB”
R² = 0.145; F = 7.275^***
IV: SI	0.121	−0.147	0.332	0.092	0.765^n.s.	H1c => not supported
Path b and c´: “DV: GPIWB”
R² = 0.269; F = 11.73^***
IV: SI (c´)	0.119	−0.326	0.144	−0.091	−0.763^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.106	0.283	0.704	0.494	4.647^***
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.068	0.323	0.183		H3c => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.049	0.248	0.138
Mediation model 4
Path c: “DV: GSIN”
R² = 0.170; F = 8.769^***
IV: SI	0.134	0.115	0.646	0.381	2.837^**	H2 => supported
Path b and c´: “DV: GSIN”
R² = 0.354; F = 17.45^***
IV: SI (c´)	0.126	−0.120	0.378	0.129	1.025^n.s.
IV: GAC (b)	0.112	0.454	0.900	0.677	6.021^***
Indirect effect (a*b)		0.101	0.421	0.251		H4 => supported, full mediation
CSIE		0.064	0.286	0.168

Note(s): n = 132; ^***p < 0.001; ^**p < 0.01; ^*p < 0.05; n.s. = not significant; CSIE = Completely Standardized Indirect Effect

Source(s): Authors’ estimation based on Hayes' PROCESS macro 4.1 in SPSS 28

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable