Table 5:

The number of kin and endogamous colleagues on the city level, 1640–1789.

CityProvinceIntendantsKinEndogamy
MoulinsBourbonnais351312
LimogesLimousin341611
RouenNormandy341517
RiomAuvergne301313
SoissonsÎle-de-France291212
ToursTouraine291014
PoitiersPoitou26137
Chalons-sur-SaôneBurgundy2300
AmiensPicardy22158
MontaubanGuyenne-Gascony2279
PauBéarn221110
CaenNormandy21102
GrenobleDauphine2097
La RochelleAunis2063
LyonLyonnais20910
ParisÎle-de-France201412
AlençonNormandy19119
BordeauxGuyenne-Gascony1978
MetzTrois-Évêchés19118
PerpignanRoussillon1971
BourgesBerry1855
DijonBurgundy18114
OrléansOrléanais18115
BesançonFranche-Comté1675
StrasbourgAlsace1696
AuchGuyenne-Gascony1575
RennesBrittany1486
LilleFlanders-Hainaut1265
ValenciennesFlanders-Hainaut1243
AixProvence1063
ToulouseLanguedoc973
DunkirkDunkirk821
MontpellierLanguedoc860
NancyLorraine760
MaubeugeFlanders-Hainaut602
BayonneGuyenne-Gascony412
ArtoisPicardy221
TrévouxLyonnais100
YpresFlanders-Hainaut111

Notes: orted by the descending number of intendants on the city level.

Source: See the Empirical Strategy section.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal