Table 4

Results of the proposed relationships

HypothesisPathβSigResult
 Overall model   
H1aAgency → CL0.247**Supported
H1bAgency → CMPT0.246**Supported
H1cAgency → SPL0.236**Supported
H1dAgency → CMPL0.156*Supported
H2Agency → PRCP0.505**Supported
 PRCP → CL0.441** 
 PRCP → CMPT0.0570.514 
 PRCP → SPL0.393** 
 PRCP → CMPL0.558** 
 Communion → CL−0.6680.281 
 Communion → CMPT−0.6400.373 
 Communion → SPL0.3440.490 
 Communion → CMPL−0.2850.629 
H4aCommunion × PRCP → CL0.2470.032*Supported
H4bCommunion × PRCP → CMPT0.0390.768Not supported
H4cCommunion × PRCP → SPL0.2120.021*Supported
H4dCommunion × PRCP → CMPL0.0410.708Not supported
H5aRU-SE × agency → CL0.1960.207Not supported
H5bRU-SE × agency → CMPT−0.4330.015*Supported
H5cRU-SE × agency → SPL0.1550.293Not supported
H5dRU-SE × agency → CMPL−0.0470.749Not supported
Note(s):

CL = collaborative; CMPT = competitive; SPL = supplementary; CMPL = complementary relationship; PRCP = perceived robot competence; RU-SE = robot-use self-efficacy; Agency = robot agency; Communion = robot communion. *p < 0.05, **p < 0.001

Source(s): Table by the authors
[ViewLarge]
This Feature Is Available To Subscribers Only

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options