Table 7.

Robustness checks

VariableModel 1 ESG_perf Coeff. (p-value) No lagModel 2 ESG_perf Coeff. (p-value) One-year lagModel 3 ESG_perf Coeff. (p-value) Two-years lag
B_size0.0899 (0.0345)0.0572** (0.0366)0.0683** (0.0392)
B_gend0.1734 (0.0860)0.2894 (0.1405)0.4477 (0.1892)
B_mgend0.2163* (0.1684)0.3161** (0.1632)0.6973** (0.3689)
B_ind0.0563* (0.0317)0.0589** (0.0277)0.0632** (0.0313)
CSR_com0.0342* (0.0237)0.0388* (0.0224)0.0365* (0.0242)
CEO_dual−0.0127 (0.0166)*−0.0138 (0.0163)−0.0127 (0.0164)
Board age0.03240.00620.0019
Control variablesYesYesYes
R20.43550.53460.3887
B_size0.0768 (0.0347)0.0585** (0.0366)0.0675** (0.0374)
B_gend0.1767 (0.0863)0.2882 (0.1410)0.4459 (0.1852)
B_mgend0.2196* (0.1663)0.3160** (0.1632)0.6947** (0.3640)
B_ind0.0584* (0.0312)0.0597** (0.0266)0.0630** (0.0315)
CSR_com0.0347* (0.0242)0.0379* (0.0235)0.0372* (0.0297)
CEO_dual−0.0127 (0.0177)*−0.0138 (0.0152)−0.0125 (0.0147)
Control variablesYesYesYes
R20.45440.55830.3594
Note(s):

n = 119 (number of utility firms). ∑iTin = 595 (number of utility firm-year observations). Panel fixed effects (within) estimation (significant Hausman test). Firm-level clustered robust standard errors are in brackets *, ** and ***denotes level of significance at the 0.10, 0.05 and 0.01 levels, respectively

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options