Table 6

Triangulation of institutional, market and organisational barriers to sustainable procurement

Framework componentQuantitative evidenceQualitative evidenceTriangulated interpretation
Institutional constraintsPPPFA dominance (M = 4.75); absence of SP policy (M = 3.68); mandate conflict (M = 3.04)Emphasis on PPPFA; policy–practice gap; environmental criteria absentRegulatory logic structurally prioritises socio-economic compliance over sustainability
Governance failuresCorruption (M = 3.75)Political interference; fronting; weak consequence managementWeak governance undermines transparent, sustainability-oriented procurement
Supplier-market constraintsInsufficient green suppliers (M = 4.75)“No market for green suppliers”; low supplier awarenessLimited supplier readiness constrains feasible sustainable sourcing
Organisational practicesEconomic dominance (M = 4.25); weak environmental focus (M = 3.21)Cost-driven decisions; outdated specifications; no environmental auditsRoutines favour cost and compliance over sustainability
Capability constraintsLow awareness (M = 3.21); skills gaps (M = 2.75)Lack of training; limited understanding of SPHuman and technical capacity limits operationalisation of SP
Schedule moderationSchedule 3: higher cost focus; lower awareness (p < 0.05)Schedule 3 compliance-driven; Schedule 2 partial integrationStructural position moderates barrier severity and manifestation

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options