Table 4

Modifications made to address overlaps/distinctions in existing knowledge category classifications

Current knowledge categorySource studyDefinition/scopeOverlaps or distinctions identified in other studiesRationale for consolidation/separationModified knowledge category proposed in this study
Design performanceTabesh and Staub-French (2006) Criteria, if not satisfied, could lead to performance issues in a component/system
Primarily relate to the geometric attributes of building components/systems, such as component type, component geometry, slope and location, which impact their main function
Overlaps with
  • -

    Functionality and efficiency (Guo et al., 2013)

  • -

    Performance (Hu and Castro-Lacouture, 2018)

  • -

    System function/performance (Korman et al., 2003)

  • -

    Slope, component geometry and component type (Wang and Leite, 2016)

All knowledge categories have conceptually similar scope – unified for consistencyConsolidated as “functional requirements”
System requirementsWang and Leite (2016) Primarily refers to the systems to which different building components belongOverlaps with
  • -

    System function/performance (Korman et al., 2003)

  • -

    Connections (Tatum and Korman, 2000)

All knowledge categories have conceptually similar scope – unified for consistencyConsolidated as “system requirements”
ClearanceWang and Leite (2013), Hu and Castro-Lacouture (2018) Primarily refers to the clearance space given for building components for different purposes, like mitigating heat exchange, controlling vibration issues and minimising conflictsDistinct from;
Insulation/clearance requirements (Wang and Leite, 2016; Tatum and Korman, 2000; Tabesh and Staub-French, 2006; Korman et al., 2003)
Previous studies classified clearance requirements with insulation requirements – Different underlying focusSeparated into “clearance requirements” and “insulation requirements”
Space requirementsHu and Castro-Lacouture (2018), Wang et al. (2013, 2016), Rocha (2011), Wang and Leite (2016), Tabesh and Staub-French (2006) Primarily refers to the physical spaces necessary to accommodate different building systems and componentsOverlaps with
- Installation space (Wang and Leite, 2013; Hu and Castro-Lacouture, 2018; Tabesh and Staub-French, 2006)
Both have conceptually similar scope–unified for consistencyConsolidated as “space requirements”
Access requirementsHu and Castro-Lacouture (2018), Wang et al. (2013), 2016), Tatum and Korman (2000), Tabesh and Staub-French (2006), Korman et al. (2003), Tatum and Korman (1999) Primarily refers to the space needed to provide access to building components for their operations and maintenance activitiesOverlaps with
  • -

    Access frequency, and access space (Wang and Leite, 2013, 2016)

  • -

    Access for operation and access for maintenance (Tatum and Korman, 1999)

All have conceptually similar scope–unified for consistencyConsolidated as “accessibility requirements”
Expandability requirementsGuo et al. (2013) Primarily refers to all flexibility conditions for adjustments in building system components and their associated space areasOverlaps with
  • -

    Adaptability requirements (Rocha, 2011)

  • -

    Expandability and retrofit requirements (Tatum and Korman, 2000)

All have conceptually similar scope–unified for consistencyConsolidated as “Expandability/retrofit requirements”
MaintainabilityGuo et al. (2013) Primarily refers to the maintenance space and operation routes that need to be taken into considerationOverlaps with the scope of the following knowledge categories
  • -

    Space requirement

  • -

    Accessibility requirement

Maintainability knowledge area includes both space management and accessibility consideration aspects – separated into twoRemoved the knowledge area to separate and categorise under “space requirements” and “accessibility requirements”
Coordination with civil worksGuo et al. (2013) Primarily refers to the process of installing building components in coordination with other civil worksOverlaps with
  • -

    Sequencing considerations (Korman et al., 2003)

Both have conceptually similar scope–unified for consistencyConsolidated as “sequencing considerations”
Economy requirementsRocha (2011) Primarily refers to the cost components/aspects to be considered when making decisionsOverlaps with
  • -

    Cost requirements (Wang and Leite, 2013, 2016)

Both have conceptually similar scope–unified for consistencyConsolidated as “cost requirements”
Comfort requirementsRocha (2011) Primarily refers to all habitability conditions for building usersContains the scope of the following knowledge categories
  • -

    Lighting requirements (Wang and Leite, 2013, 2016)

  • -

    Indoor air quality requirements (Wang and Leite, 2013, 2016)

  • -

    Indoor environment conditions (Petrova et al., 2018)

All the habitability conditions identified by other studies were categorised under the main knowledge area – comfort requirementsConsolidated as “comfort requirements”
ConstructabilityGuo et al. (2013) Mainly represents the factors affecting the sequence of building component installationContains the scope of the following knowledge categories
  • -

    Safety requirements

  • -

    Access requirements

  • -

    Configuration (Wang et al., 2013, 2016)

Given its broad scope, the constructability knowledge area was disaggregated into relevant, distinct knowledge aspects for more clarityDisaggregated into “safety considerations”, “access requirements” and “configuration”

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options