Table 1 Quantitative comparison for... | Emerald Publishing

Table 1

Quantitative comparison for enhancing clean dark videos. The best scores are indicated in bold.

Method	PSNR↑	SSIM↑	AB(Var)↓	MABD↓
LIME [11]	17.36	0.7386	9.65	0.37
Dual [39]	18.12	0.8283	2.13	0.07
MBLLEN [27]	18.41	0.8100	77.24	1.95
RetinexNet [37]	19.78	0.8353	1.32	0.09
SID [7]	22.95	0.9428	4.93	0.43
DRP [24]	6.89	0.3160	6.73	0.52
NATLE [2]	26.70	0.9127	2.04	0.03
MBLLVEN [27]	24.50	0.9482	1.79	0.80
SMOID [14]	24.85	0.9472	1.30	0.17
SFR [9]	23.81	0.9413	2.14	0.11
BLIND [19]	22.87	0.9344	8.66	0.43
StableLLVE [38]	24.07	0.9483	1.96	0.05
SDSD [35]	25.09	0.8783	0.98	0.01
SALVE (Ours)	28.85	0.9225	1.47	0.006

Method	PSNR↑	SSIM↑	AB(Var)↓	MABD↓
LIME [11]	17.36	0.7386	9.65	0.37
Dual [39]	18.12	0.8283	2.13	0.07
MBLLEN [27]	18.41	0.8100	77.24	1.95
RetinexNet [37]	19.78	0.8353	1.32	0.09
SID [7]	22.95	0.9428	4.93	0.43
DRP [24]	6.89	0.3160	6.73	0.52
NATLE [2]	26.70	0.9127	2.04	0.03
MBLLVEN [27]	24.50	0.9482	1.79	0.80
SMOID [14]	24.85	0.9472	1.30	0.17
SFR [9]	23.81	0.9413	2.14	0.11
BLIND [19]	22.87	0.9344	8.66	0.43
StableLLVE [38]	24.07	0.9483	1.96	0.05
SDSD [35]	25.09	0.8783	0.98	0.01
SALVE (Ours)	28.85	0.9225	1.47	0.006