Objective performance and time complexity of RDOQ, O-QPC, and F-QPC under Cl.
| End-to-End BD-AttrRate [%] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cl_ai | RDOQ | O-QPC | F-QPC | ||||||
| Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | |
| Solid average | -0.5% | -10.8% | -10.2% | -2.2% | -10.2% | -7.8% | -1.9% | -8.3% | -6.2% |
| Dense average | -0.9% | -11.5% | -11.3% | -1.3% | -11.4% | -11.0% | -0.9% | -9.6% | -9.7% |
| Sparse average | -0.1% | -9.5% | -9.8% | -0.6% | -11.1% | -11.2% | -0.2% | -7.9% | -8.1% |
| Scant average | -0.6% | -11.3% | -11.7% | -0.7% | -12.8% | -14.3% | -0.2% | -10.1% | -11.2% |
| Overall average | -0.6% | -10.9% | -10.9% | -1.2% | -12.5% | -11.4% | -0.7% | -9.2% | -9.3% |
| Avg. Enc Time [%] | 102% | 100% * | 100% | ||||||
| Avg. Dec Time [%] | 101% | 100% * | 100% | ||||||
| End-to-End BD-AttrRate [%] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cl_ai | RDOQ | O-QPC | F-QPC | ||||||
| Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | |
| Solid average | -10.8% | -10.2% | -10.2% | -7.8% | -8.3% | -6.2% | |||
| Dense average | -11.5% | -11.3% | -11.4% | -11.0% | -9.6% | -9.7% | |||
| Sparse average | -9.5% | -9.8% | -11.1% | -11.2% | -7.9% | -8.1% | |||
| Scant average | -11.3% | -11.7% | -12.8% | -14.3% | -10.1% | -11.2% | |||
| Overall average | -10.9% | -10.9% | -12.5% | -11.4% | -9.2% | -9.3% | |||
| Avg. Enc Time [%] | 102% | 100% | 100% | ||||||
| Avg. Dec Time [%] | 101% | 100% | 100% | ||||||
Note: * denotes that here the time for offline pre-analysis is not included for O-QPC.