Objective performance and time complexity of RDOQ, O-QPC, and F-QPC under C2.
| End-to-End BD-AttrRate [%] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2_ai | RDOQ | O-QPC | F-QPC | ||||||
| Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | |
| Solid average | -0.0% | -12.6% | -11.4% | -4.1% | -12.3% | -8.9% | -3.5% | -10.2% | -7.0% |
| Dense average | -1.4% | -13.0% | -11.0% | -5.2% | -14.5% | -13.4% | -4.8% | -13.3% | -11.9% |
| Sparse average | -1.3% | -11.2% | -11.2% | -6.2% | -9.2% | -8.9% | -5.7% | -7.9% | -8.2% |
| Scant average | -0.5% | -11.9% | -12.2% | -1.0% | -10.3% | -11.2% | -0.3% | -10.2% | -11.2% |
| Overall average | -0.8% | -12.1% | -11.6% | -3.6% | -12.3% | -11.9% | -3.1% | -10.5% | -10.0% |
| Avg. Enc Time [%] | 98% | 100% * | 100% | ||||||
| Avg. Dec Time [%] | 97% | 100% * | 100% | ||||||
| End-to-End BD-AttrRate [%] | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| C2_ai | RDOQ | O-QPC | F-QPC | ||||||
| Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | Luma | Cb | Cr | |
| Solid average | -12.6% | -11.4% | -12.3% | -8.9% | -10.2% | -7.0% | |||
| Dense average | -13.0% | -11.0% | -14.5% | -13.4% | -13.3% | -11.9% | |||
| Sparse average | -11.2% | -11.2% | -9.2% | -8.9% | -7.9% | -8.2% | |||
| Scant average | -11.9% | -12.2% | -10.3% | -11.2% | -10.2% | -11.2% | |||
| Overall average | -12.1% | -11.6% | -12.3% | -11.9% | -10.5% | -10.0% | |||
| Avg. Enc Time [%] | 98% | 100% | 100% | ||||||
| Avg. Dec Time [%] | 97% | 100% | 100% | ||||||
Note: * denotes that here the time for offline pre-analysis is not included for O-QPC.