Detection performance comparison for images corrupted by additive white Gaussian noise with standard deviation σ = 0.02, 0.06, 0.1. The boldface and the underbar indicate the best and the second-best results, respectively.
| Noise σ | Method | Features or Designs | Fl score | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02 | Zhao et al. [36] | Spatial + Histogram | 83.04% | 82.41% | 83.67% |
| Spatial + Frequency | 75.63% | 78.42% | 73.04% | ||
| Histogram + Frequency | 81.47% | 76.62% | 86.98% | ||
| Spatial + Histogram + Frequency | 83.25% | 81.47% | 85.11% | ||
| DefakeHop [4] | 91.84% | 93.75% | 90.00% | ||
| Geo-DefakeHop (Ours) | PixelHop A | 97.56% | 96.38% | 98.77% | |
| PixelHop Β | 98.90% | 98.05% | 99.75% | ||
| PixelHop C | 99.01% | 98.53% | 99.50% | ||
| PixelHop A&B&C | 98.65% | 97.58% | 99.75% | ||
| 0.06 | Zhao et al. [36] | Spatial + Histogram | 80.74% | 80.94% | 80.54% |
| Spatial + Frequency | 76.39% | 78.47% | 74.42% | ||
| Histogram + Frequency | 80.28% | 75.49% | 85.71% | ||
| Spatial + Histogram + Frequency | 81.42% | 79.40% | 83.55% | ||
| DefakeHop [4] | 92.78% | 95.75% | 90.00% | ||
| Geo-DefakeHop (Ours) | PixelHop A | 95.24% | 93.98% | 96.53% | |
| PixelHop Β | 96.59% | 95.19% | 98.02% | ||
| PixelHop C | 95.07% | 94.70% | 97.28% | ||
| PixelHop A&B&C | 96.59% | 95.19% | 98.02% | ||
| 0.1 | Zhao et al. [36] | Spatial + Histogram | 81.74% | 78.42% | 85.35% |
| Spatial + Frequency | 69.05% | 70.35% | 67.79% | ||
| Histogram + Frequency | 79.44% | 74.67% | 84.86% | ||
| Spatial + Histogram + Frequency | 80.05% | 77.78% | 82.46% | ||
| DefakeHop [4] | 92.63% | 97.78% | 88.00% | ||
| Geo-DefakeHop (Ours) | PixelHop A | 94.43% | 92.42% | 96.53% | |
| PixelHop Β | 94.88% | 93.51% | 96.29% | ||
| PixelHop C | 95.37% | 93.99% | 96.78% | ||
| PixelHop A&B&C | 96.10% | 94.71% | 97.52% |
| Noise | Method | Features or Designs | Fl score | Precision | Recall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0.02 | Zhao | Spatial + Histogram | 83.04% | 82.41% | 83.67% |
| Spatial + Frequency | 75.63% | 78.42% | 73.04% | ||
| Histogram + Frequency | 81.47% | 76.62% | 86.98% | ||
| Spatial + Histogram + Frequency | 83.25% | 81.47% | 85.11% | ||
| DefakeHop [ | 91.84% | 93.75% | 90.00% | ||
| Geo-DefakeHop (Ours) | PixelHop A | 97.56% | 96.38% | 98.77% | |
| PixelHop Β | 98.90% | 98.05% | |||
| PixelHop C | 99.50% | ||||
| PixelHop A&B&C | 98.65% | 97.58% | |||
| 0.06 | Zhao | Spatial + Histogram | 80.74% | 80.94% | 80.54% |
| Spatial + Frequency | 76.39% | 78.47% | 74.42% | ||
| Histogram + Frequency | 80.28% | 75.49% | 85.71% | ||
| Spatial + Histogram + Frequency | 81.42% | 79.40% | 83.55% | ||
| DefakeHop [ | 92.78% | 90.00% | |||
| Geo-DefakeHop (Ours) | PixelHop A | 95.24% | 93.98% | 96.53% | |
| PixelHop Β | 95.19% | ||||
| PixelHop C | 95.07% | 94.70% | 97.28% | ||
| PixelHop A&B&C | 95.19% | ||||
| 0.1 | Zhao | Spatial + Histogram | 81.74% | 78.42% | 85.35% |
| Spatial + Frequency | 69.05% | 70.35% | 67.79% | ||
| Histogram + Frequency | 79.44% | 74.67% | 84.86% | ||
| Spatial + Histogram + Frequency | 80.05% | 77.78% | 82.46% | ||
| DefakeHop [ | 92.63% | 88.00% | |||
| Geo-DefakeHop (Ours) | PixelHop A | 94.43% | 92.42% | 96.53% | |
| PixelHop Β | 94.88% | 93.51% | 96.29% | ||
| PixelHop C | 95.37% | 93.99% | 96.78% | ||
| PixelHop A&B&C | 94.71% |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.