Comparison of F1-scores of four detection methods under the weak supervision data setting, where X-Y-Z means that X% of training, Y% of validation and Z% of test data samples.
| 40-10-50 | 10-10-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Zhao et al. | 87.82% | 86.62% |
| Wang et al. | 100% | 99.64% |
| ResNet18 | 99.85% | 98.87% |
| ResNet18-FFT | 99.98% | 99.88% |
| Geo-DefakeHop | 99.93% | 99.67% |
| 40-10-50 | 10-10-80 | |
|---|---|---|
| Zhao et al. | 87.82% | 86.62% |
| Wang et al. | 99.64% | |
| ResNet18 | 99.85% | 98.87% |
| ResNet18-FFT | 99.98% | |
| Geo-DefakeHop | 99.93% | 99.67% |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.