Thematic analysis of selected book publications
| THEMES | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source no. (from Table 2) | 1. Agenda | 2. Pedagogy | 3. Student experience | 4. Project type | 5. Staffing and leadership | 6. Facilities and funding | 7. Teaching research nexus | 8. Risks |
| 1 | Giving back to community, social relevance | Team size, communication skills, construction studios, synthesise knowledge | Collaboration, team building | Project size, project materials | delegation | fundraising | Liability and safety | |
| 2 | Social welfare, ethical responsibility, service to the community | Out of the theoretical Students make their own mistakes | Classroom of the community, gained confidence, teamwork | Houses, community buildings | Subversive leadership (e.g. outside the mainstream) | Salvaged, recycled or donated, grants | Risk-averse faculty | |
| 3 | community engagement, mission, outreach | curriculum/pedagogy | Multidiscipline teams, profound impact | History and leadership | sources of support | Research and design method, design research, field research | At-risk clients | |
| 6 | Usefulness of architecture, responsibility to the public, educational, humanism, help to understand the building process (educate) | Pedagogical structure, professional training, educational value, innovation, learning experience | Collaborate, design groups, social experience, client relations, own physical labour, team design, valuable | Community Centre, buildable within time, local, affordable housing | Faculty involvement, transitioning, support of Dean | Funding, grant proposals | Risks, unprecedented, potential disasters | |
| 9 | Pedagogical tool, People/processes/materials/construction/other skills, value systems, social responsibility | Method, learning intentions, outcomes, assessment means, criteria, semester structures, curriculum | Community engagement, social good, transformative experience, collaboration, open mindedness, communication | Sufficiently skilled (staff to teach DB) | Evidence-based, academic research, metrics | Liability, risk-taking | ||
| 10 | Motivation, Community design | Educational objectives, Interaction, communication and collaboration, self-directed, application, tectonics, experiential learning theory | Collaborative skills, social values, professional attitudes, journal, reflection, ownership | Interior, one project outcome, prefabricated | Educators and instructors become facilitators | workshop | Further reflection and assessment | Successes and Failures, Challenges and drawbacks, burnout, safety awareness |
| 11 | Community, values | Curriculum, enrolment (choices), reflective building | Community, consensus, fun | Type, project scope, project budget, permits | instructors | Workshop or shop, mobile shop, grants, fundraising | Risk, mistakes, liability, safety | |
| 13 | Agenda, Essential themes, motivations People, collaborate | Process, pedagogical mission Team Soft skills | Practice, Dialogue, impact | Pavilions, installations, permanent projects | Diverse team | Grant funding Project funding Re-use Space, storage, logistics, self-funded, client funded | Community engaged scholarship, Evaluate | Living with your mistakes Failure Safety Licence Permits Legal framework, contract, liability |
| 14 | Social responsibility, community driven, social advocacy, pragmatist philosophy, build a capacity | Pedagogy of design-build, real world, interpersonal skills, handcraft and digital fabrication, curriculum, peripheral courses | Understanding material relationships, experience-based respect for the builders, material feedback, Genuine client interaction | Short build, long build | Design and research, time for research | |||
| 23 | Various agendas, research agenda | Pedagogical models, Assessment, syllabus design | Preparing students for practice | Regulatory conditions | Shared and sustainable, DB faculty, leadership | Infrastructure, Research income, Align with industry | Research agendas | obstacles |
| 24 | Principles Social architecture, collaboration and social skills, testing development, objectives | Pedagogy, Curriculum and students Teaching strategies, assessment, learning outcomes | Colleagues, chosen studios | Project procurement, public and common good | (challenges created by) Retirement, academisation | Fundraising, donations. Workshops, no fees | When things go wrong, liability, accidents, contract | |
| THEMES | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Source no. (from | 1. Agenda | 2. Pedagogy | 3. Student experience | 4. Project type | 5. Staffing and leadership | 6. Facilities and funding | 7. Teaching research nexus | 8. Risks |
| 1 | Giving back to community, social relevance | Team size, communication skills, construction studios, synthesise knowledge | Collaboration, team building | Project size, project materials | delegation | fundraising | Liability and safety | |
| 2 | Social welfare, ethical responsibility, service to the community | Out of the theoretical | Classroom of the community, gained confidence, teamwork | Houses, community buildings | Subversive leadership (e.g. outside the mainstream) | Salvaged, recycled or donated, grants | Risk-averse faculty | |
| 3 | community engagement, mission, outreach | curriculum/pedagogy | Multidiscipline teams, profound impact | History and leadership | sources of support | Research and design method, design research, field research | At-risk clients | |
| 6 | Usefulness of architecture, responsibility to the public, educational, humanism, help to understand the building process (educate) | Pedagogical structure, professional training, educational value, innovation, learning experience | Collaborate, design groups, social experience, client relations, own physical labour, team design, valuable | Community Centre, buildable within time, local, affordable housing | Faculty involvement, transitioning, support of Dean | Funding, grant proposals | Risks, unprecedented, potential disasters | |
| 9 | Pedagogical tool, People/processes/materials/construction/other skills, value systems, social responsibility | Method, learning intentions, outcomes, assessment means, criteria, semester structures, curriculum | Community engagement, social good, transformative experience, collaboration, open mindedness, communication | Sufficiently skilled (staff to teach | Evidence-based, academic research, metrics | Liability, risk-taking | ||
| 10 | Motivation, Community design | Educational objectives, Interaction, communication and collaboration, self-directed, application, tectonics, experiential learning theory | Collaborative skills, social values, professional attitudes, journal, reflection, ownership | Interior, one project outcome, prefabricated | Educators and instructors become facilitators | workshop | Further reflection and assessment | Successes and Failures, Challenges and drawbacks, burnout, safety awareness |
| 11 | Community, values | Curriculum, enrolment (choices), reflective building | Community, consensus, fun | Type, project scope, project budget, permits | instructors | Workshop or shop, mobile shop, grants, fundraising | Risk, mistakes, liability, safety | |
| 13 | Agenda, Essential themes, motivations | Process, pedagogical mission | Practice, | Pavilions, installations, permanent projects | Diverse team | Grant funding | Community engaged scholarship, Evaluate | Living with your mistakes |
| 14 | Social responsibility, community driven, social advocacy, pragmatist philosophy, build a capacity | Pedagogy of design-build, real world, interpersonal skills, handcraft and digital fabrication, curriculum, peripheral courses | Understanding material relationships, experience-based respect for the builders, material feedback, Genuine client interaction | Short build, long build | Design and research, time for research | |||
| 23 | Various agendas, research agenda | Pedagogical models, Assessment, syllabus design | Preparing students for practice | Regulatory conditions | Shared and sustainable, | Infrastructure, Research income, Align with industry | Research agendas | obstacles |
| 24 | Principles | Pedagogy, Curriculum and students | Colleagues, chosen studios | Project procurement, public and common good | (challenges created by) Retirement, academisation | Fundraising, donations. Workshops, no fees | When things go wrong, liability, accidents, contract | |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.