Table 6

Results of structural model and hypothesis testing results

HypothesisStructural relationshipsPath coefficientt-valuep-valueResult
H1ATT → BI0.1613.7030.000Supported
H2SN → BI0.61716.2240.000Supported
H3BI → APB0.1793.6480.000Supported
H4ATT → APB0.1142.1460.016Supported
H5SAT → APB0.2694.4020.000Supported
H6LOY → APB0.2233.5700.000Supported
H7SAT → LOY0.2294.4160.000Supported
H8SQP → SAT0.62418.7750.000Supported
H9SQP → LOY0.54411.7680.000Supported
H10SQP → APB−0.0510.6870.247No supported
Total indirect effects on APB
ATT → APB0.0292.4290.008
SN → APB0.1103.5810.000
SAT → APB0.0512.7580.003
SQP → APB0.3215.4060.000
Coefficients of determination (R2) & predictive relevance (Q2)
R2 (APB) = 0.299R2 adjusted (APB) = 0.291Q2 (APB) = 0.170
R2 (BI) = 0.490R2 adjusted (BI) = 0.488Q2 (BI) = 0.480
R2 (LOY) = 0.504R2 adjusted (LOY) = 0.502Q2 (LOY) = 0.47
R2 (SAT) = 0.389R2 adjusted (SAT) = 0.388Q2 (SAT) = 0.386

Note(s): APB: Actual Purchase Behaviour, ATT: Attitude, BI: Behavioural Intention, LOY: Attitudinal loyalty, SAT: Satisfaction, SN: Subjective Norms, SQP: Service Quality Perceptions

Source(s): Authors’ own work

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal