Table 3

Quantitative comparisons between MSAN and other methods in terms of the mean PSNR and SSIM on the FMD dataset [54]. The first and second best performances are denoted in red and blue, respectively. Methods marked with ‘*’ were trained with the training dataset [54].

MethodsPSNR(dB)/SSIM
The number of raw images for averagingAverage value
124816
Traditional methodNoised27.22 / 0.544230.08 / 0.680032.86 / 0.798136.03 / 0.889239.70 / 0.948733.18 / 0.7740
NLM31.25 / 0.750332.85 / 0.811634.92 / 0.876337.09 / 0.920840.04 / 0.954035.23 / 0.8626
BM3D32.71 / 0.792234.09 / 0.843036.05 / 0.897038.01 / 0.933640.61 / 0.959836.29 / 0.8851
KSVD32.02 / 0.774633.69 / 0.832735.84 / 0.893337.79 / 0.931440.36 / 0.958535.94 / 0.8781
EPLL32.61 / 0.787634.07 / 0.841436.08 / 0.897038.12 / 0.934940.83 / 0.961836.34 / 0.8845
WNNM32.52 / 0.788034.04 / 0.841936.04 / 0.897337.95 / 0.933440.45 / 0.958736.20 / 0.8839
PURE-LET31.95 / 0.766433.49 / 0.827035.29 / 0.881437.25 / 0.921239.59 / 0.945035.51 / 0.8682
Early DLDnCNN*34.88 / 0.906336.02 / 0.925737.57 / 0.946039.28 / 0.958841.57 / 0.972137.86 / 0.9418
IRCNN*34.70 / 0.897735.83 / 0.921737.37 / 0.943939.10 / 0.957141.18 / 0.969537.64 / 0.9380
MemNet*33.04 / 0.831435.23 / 0.901837.16 / 0.938339.02 / 0.955541.15 / 0.968737.12 / 0.9191
SotA DLNoise2Noise*35.40 / 0.918736.40 / 0.923037.59 / 0.948139.43 / 0.960141.45 / 0.972438.05 / 0.9445
MWCNN*35.40 / 0.919036.33 / 0.932937.62 / 0.948939.32 / 0.960841.39 / 0.973638.01 / 0.9470
RIDNet*35.63 / 0.916736.41 / 0.932537.97 / 0.949839.55 / 0.961041.58 / 0.974038.23 / 0.9468
DPDN*35.64 / 0.918936.35 / 0.932238.02 / 0.950139.51 / 0.961141.50 / 0.974438.20 / 0.9472
WF-UNet*34.45 / 0.897835.58 / 0.920437.29 / 0.942738.97 / 0.956141.23 / 0.968937.50 / 0.9372
MSAN* (Ours)35.78 / 0.921636.85 / 0.936238.19 / 0.950739.70 / 0.962141.31 / 0.973838.37 / 0.9489

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal