Table 4

Quantitative comparisons between MSAN and other methods in terms of the mean PSNR and SSIM on the W2S dataset [56]. The first and second best performances are denoted in red and blue, respectively. Methods marked with ‘*’ were trained with the training dataset [56].

MethodsPSNR(dB)/SSIM
The number of raw images for averagingAverage value
124816
Traditional methodNoised21.34 / 0.361223.78 / 0.448026.38 / 0.547329.10 / 0.653731.92 / 0.755526.50 / 0.5531
NLM23.68 / 0.773126.61 / 0.820429.69 / 0.859732.57 / 0.889935.29 / 0.916929.57 / 0.8520
BM3D24.18 / 0.808127.20 / 0.850830.33 / 0.883433.21 / 0.907536.00 / 0.929830.18 / 0.8760
KSVD23.83 / 0.784126.83 / 0.830729.99 / 0.869632.93 / 0.898935.80 / 0.925529.88 / 0.8617
EPLL24.09 / 0.799827.12 / 0.845430.25 / 0.880333.14 / 0.905935.94 / 0.929130.11 / 0.8721
WNNM24.01 / 0.800527.04 / 0.845030.20 / 0.879733.12 / 0.905335.97 / 0.928830.07 / 0.8719
PURE-LET24.09 / 0.800027.16 / 0.843430.29 / 0.878333.15 / 0.902635.89 / 0.926030.12 / 0.8701
Early DLDnCNN*33.51 / 0.902935.04 / 0.918937.23 / 0.933738.62 / 0.94540.15 / 0.954036.91 / 0.9309
IRCNN *33.49 / 0.909434.94 / 0.923537.08 / 0.935638.68 / 0.947739.87 / 0.955736.81 / 0.9344
MemNet*31.45 / 0.876734.28 / 0.912135.76 / 0.923337.20 / 0.931939.17 / 0.949335.57 / 0.9187
SotA DLNoise2Noise*32.93 / 0.905535.19 / 0.920337.02 / 0.931338.41 / 0.946740.13 / 0.955636.74 / 0.9319
MWCNN*32.89 / 0.894634.69 / 0.917936.90 / 0.933738.31 / 0.944740.00 / 0.954736.56 / 0.9291
RIDNet*33.70 / 0.870734.91 / 0.898336.97 / 0.925438.53 / 0.944640.20 / 0.958936.86 / 0.9196
DPDN*33.51 / 0.872835.33 / 0.891537.07 / 0.923138.54 / 0.945639.81 / 0.950136.85 / 0.9166
WF-UNet*32.67 / 0.736634.31 / 0.831635.88 / 0.850737.04 / 0.871439.26 / 0.889535.83 / 0.8360
MSAN* (Ours)33.79 / 0.910235.57 / 0.926737.33 / 0.937838.81 / 0.948840.20 / 0.953837.14 / 0.9354

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal