Results of ego-centred social network analysis
| Characteristics | Min | Max | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree | 1 | 18 | 7.46 | 3.84 |
| Density | 0 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Weak ties | 0 | 6 | 2.42 | 1.96 |
| Strong ties | 0 | 10 | 1.76 | 1.66 |
| Compositional quality | 0 | 17 | 3.07 | 3.28 |
| Emotional support | 0 | 13 | 3.74 | 3.03 |
| Instrumental support | 0 | 17 | 3.04 | 3.34 |
| Appraisal | 0 | 13 | 4.02 | 3.34 |
| Informational support | 0 | 14 | 4.64 | 3.62 |
| Characteristics | Min | Max | M | SD |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Degree | 1 | 18 | 7.46 | 3.84 |
| Density | 0 | 1 | 0.28 | 0.24 |
| Weak ties | 0 | 6 | 2.42 | 1.96 |
| Strong ties | 0 | 10 | 1.76 | 1.66 |
| Compositional quality | 0 | 17 | 3.07 | 3.28 |
| Emotional support | 0 | 13 | 3.74 | 3.03 |
| Instrumental support | 0 | 17 | 3.04 | 3.34 |
| Appraisal | 0 | 13 | 4.02 | 3.34 |
| Informational support | 0 | 14 | 4.64 | 3.62 |
Note(s): N = 50. Results of the social network analysis of ego-centred qualitative social network maps; Density ranges from 0 to 1; support types according to House (1981), compositional quality = alters helpful for the egos' career
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.