Table 2. Sufficient configurations for...

Table 2.

Sufficient configurations for successful transitions

Conditions	Configuration 1	Configuration 2	Configuration 3
Label	The linguistically autonomous learner	The academically anchored learner	The systemically integrated learner
RO	●	⊗	●
AD		●	●
M	⊗
A		⊗	●
PP			●
ING
Consistency	1	1	0.92
Raw coverage	0.14	0.09	0.55
Unique coverage	0.14	0.09	0.55
Key cases	2, 8, 33	1, 9	3, 5, 6, 11, 14, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 34, 35
Solution coverage: 0.77
Solution consistency: 0.94

Conditions	Configuration 1	Configuration 2	Configuration 3
Label	The linguistically autonomous learner	The academically anchored learner	The systemically integrated learner
RO	●	⊗	●
AD		●	●
M	⊗
A		⊗	●
PP			●
ING
Consistency	1	1	0.92
Raw coverage	0.14	0.09	0.55
Unique coverage	0.14	0.09	0.55
Key cases	2, 8, 33	1, 9	3, 5, 6, 11, 14, 18, 20, 22, 23, 25, 27, 34, 35
Solution coverage: 0.77
Solution consistency: 0.94

Note(s):

● = presence of a condition; and ⊗ = absence of a condition. Big circles indicate core conditions and small circles indicate marginal conditions. Blank cells indicate the condition is irrelevant for that configuration. Key cases refer to specific student participants in the data set (n = 35)

Source(s): Authors’ own work

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable