Subsample analysis of the interrelationship between peer learning and self-perceived leadership (n = 1,247)1
| Subsample | Conservation tillage | Crop rotation | Organic fertilizer | Drip irrigation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The role of peer learning | Self-perceived leadership = 0 (n = 1,135) | 0.009** | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.018 |
| Self-perceived leadership = 1 (n = 112) | 0.022** | 0.017* | 0.013** | 0.015*** | |
| The role of self-perceived leadership | Peer learning = 0 (n = 759) | 0.002 | 0.001* | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Peer learning = 1 (n = 488) | 0.009*** | 0.010* | 0.007** | 0.005** |
| Subsample | Conservation tillage | Crop rotation | Organic fertilizer | Drip irrigation | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| The role of peer learning | Self-perceived leadership = 0 ( | 0.009** | 0.004 | 0.000 | 0.018 |
| Self-perceived leadership = 1 ( | 0.022** | 0.017* | 0.013** | 0.015*** | |
| The role of self-perceived leadership | Peer learning = 0 ( | 0.002 | 0.001* | 0.002 | 0.006 |
| Peer learning = 1 ( | 0.009*** | 0.010* | 0.007** | 0.005** |
Standard errors are reported in parentheses. *, ** and *** respectively indicate statistical significance at 10%, 5% and 1% levels
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.