| Social value (Cronbach's α = 0.923; CR = 0.937; AVE = 0.650) |
| BG4 – Community quality of life | | | 0.854 |
| BG3 – Safety in the city | | | 0.826 |
| BG6 – Level of resolution of social problems | | | 0.808 |
| BG2 – Community well-being | | | 0.800 |
| BG5 – Recreation opportunities | | | 0.789 |
| BG7 – Maintenance and public transportation | | | 0.789 |
| BG1 – Infrastructure/facilities improvements for the community | | | 0.788 |
| BG8 – Community empowerment and strengthening | | | 0.795 |
| Coopetition (Cronbach's α = 0.863; CR = 0.902; AVE = 0.648) |
| CS2 – Shared production spaces | 0.866 | | |
| CS3 – Level of community cooperation | 0.823 | | |
| CS1 – Community network | 0.817 | | |
| CS4 – Alliances among competitors | 0.801 | | |
| CS5 – Public–private partnerships for event organisation | 0.710 | | |
| Hallmark event development (Cronbach's α = 0.894; CR = 0.917; AVE = 0.583) |
| LE3 – Public management in strengthening cultural supporting | | 0.869 | |
| LE2 – Innovativeness of city public management | | 0.852 | |
| LE1 – Adequate management of support services for development | | 0.837 | |
| LE4 – The use of social media to promote local events | | 0.803 | |
| LE5 – Event accessibility for residents in economic and terms | | 0.784 | |
| LE6 – Accessibility for people with reduced mobility | | 0.708 | |
| LE8 – Residents as primary beneficiaries of the event | | 0.626 | |
| LE7 – Tourism notoriety of the city and region by the event | | 0.575 | |