Table 2

Theories that guide extant SFR research in the luxury context

S.NoTheoryArticle count*% Relative to the total sampleExemplar articles
1Three-dimensional justice framework59.80Kozub et al. (2014), Morgeson III et al. (2020) 
2Social identity theory35.88Lee and Kim (2020), Ward and Dahl (2014) 
3Theory of reasoned action35.88Mrad et al. (2022), Qian and Park (2021) 
4Attribution theory23.92Kim and Jang (2022) 
5Bottom spillover theory23.92Sirgy (2021) 
6Dissonance theory23.92Kozub et al. (2014) 
7Expectancy disconfirmation theory23.92Wu and Zhao (2023) 
8Kano model/Three-factor theory23.92Park, Lee, and Back (2020) 
9Regret theory23.92Keaveney, Huber, and Herrmann (2007) 
10Self-congruity theory23.92Bryson et al. (2013) 
11Service dominant logic23.92Carrigan et al. (2013) 
12Theory of planned behavior23.92Mrad et al. (2022) 
13Other theories3670.59Han and Hyun (2013), Loo and Leung (2018), Sundie et al. (2009), Ying, Chan, and Qi (2020) 

Note(s): *The total does not match the reviewed sample count, as some articles draw from more than one theory

Source(s): Table by author

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options