Table 5

An overview of the antecedents and moderators of SFR research in the luxury context

CategoryConstructOperating definitionRepresentative literature support
Consumer-relatedAttribute evaluation/Pre-purchase effortThe level of cognitive effort expended in terms of comparing different available alternatives for satisfying the same consumption need(s)Bolfing (1989), Keaveney et al. (2007) 
Consumer activismAwareness and consciousness of one’s responsibility to proactively pursue rights as a consumerBolfing (1989) 
Country-of-origin perceptionsBeliefs about the perceived quality of a country’s goods and services as shaped by its culture, policies, and workforce skillsBryson et al. (2021) 
DemographicsIndividual characteristics such as age, gender, education, and occupationBolfing (1989), Morgeson III et al. (2020) 
EnvyPerceived lack of some attribute of positive valence seen as present in someone else, coupled with the wish to have the sameSundie et al. (2009) 
Financial perceived riskThe consumers’ intrinsic fear of a product or service not matching the monetary sacrifice paid for itMrad et al. (2022) 
HostilityFeelings of perceived injustice, resentment and angerSundie et al. (2009) 
Image congruence/Relation to ideal self-concept/Value expressivenessMatch or coupling between a desired image of oneself often shaped by social and cultural norms and the product/service brand imageHan and Hyun (2013), Kashif et al., (2021), Ward and Dahl (2014) 
PersonalityIndividual traits such as assertiveness, self-control, and extraversion, which are quite stable yet malleableBolfing (1989) 
Firm-relatedCorporate social (ir)responsibility/Deceptive practices/Unethical practicesThe inability of some firms to go beyond treating social and environmental responsibility as a promotional exerciseBryson et al. (2021), Carrigan et al. (2013), Mrad et al. (2022) 
Employee’s conspicuous consumption cueEmployee’s display of items and possessions symbolic of luxuriousnessWu, So, Xiong, and King (2019) 
Employee empowermentEnabling employees to exercise discretion in their work, particularly aspects related to customer-facing tasksKandampully and Duddy (2001) 
Employee’s physical attractivenessConsumers’ perception of how attractive the employee is, in sensory termsWu et al. (2019) 
Hard sellExclusive emphasis on selling rather than matching the product or service to customer requirementsMrad et al. (2022) 
 Provider responsivenessSystems and processes to extract complaints and eagerness to resolve themBolfing (1989) 
Service guaranteeA commitment that the firm will be liable to compensate in case of service levels falling below a certain thresholdKandampully and Duddy (2001) 
Third-party certificationAn attestation by a neutral party to the efficacy of a firm’s goods or servicesJun et al. (2017) 
Uninformed employeesService employees not having requisite information about the firm’s offerings and processesLin and Chen (2013) 
Wellness attributesProduct/service features that help toward holistic physical and mental well-being, e.g., by facilitating stress management, nutritional awareness, physical fitness, and social sensitivityPark et al. (2020) 
Consumer-firm exchange and relationship relatedBrand hateIntense negative emotions directed at the brandKashif et al. (2021) 
Dark triad in brand personalityMachiavellianism, psychopathy and narcissism as three established facets of personality that are generally considered negative in valenceAhn (2023) 
Deficient sensory experienceLack of perceived enjoyment that can be had from employing consumption as a means to gratifying our sensesMrad et al. (2022) 
Influencer-brand poor fitWhen an endorser is dissimilar to and not well matched with the brand endorsedQian and Park (2021) 
InfringementA situation when another individual or group tries without concurrence to enter into a space that belongs to the person or group under referenceLee and Kim (2020) 
 Likeability of non-core usersPeople whom the referent consumers perceive as non-loyal to a brandLee and Kim (2020) 
 MassificationAttempting to make a product or service available to the masses rather than select consumersMrad et al. (2022) 
 Nature of failure (Outcome/Process)Outcome failures involve a deficiency in the delivery of core service, whereas process failures are deficient in the mode of provision or employees’ behaviorWu et al. (2019) 
 Overpricing perceptionCharging above the expected fair price or beyond the price communicated pre-purchaseBrochado et al. (2019), Kwon, Lee, and Bowen (2022), Sahin et al. (2017) 
 Poor interaction qualityBelow-par service delivery in terms of the attitude of front-line employees and the efficacy of customer serviceBryson et al. (2013) 
 Prior experience with the firmCustomer’s history of interactions with the same firm and resultant cumulative satisfactionMorgeson III et al. (2020) 
Service failure severityThe extent of perceived harm, which could be in monetary as well as psychological termsBolfing (1989) 
Service qualityAggregate-level perceptions of service performance, including tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathyDinçer and Alrawadieh (2017), Sahin et al. (2017), Zheng et al. (2009) 
TrustThe expectation that the firm will provide goods and services of high quality, i.e., the firm is seen as dependableJun et al. (2017) 
Wait timeTime spent before the service delivery beginsKwon et al. (2022) 
Broader market factorsConsumer nationalityThe country where the consumption market is locatedPrayag and Ryan (2012) 
CultureConsumption differences across markets, as shaped by broader social norms, e.g., power distance, uncertainty avoidance, time orientation, collectivism, masculinity, and restraintAmatulli et al. (2021), Ying et al. (2020) 
Economic and industry factorsMacro aspects such as aggregate growth and consumer spending and industry-specific variations, e.g., in the degree of competitionMorgeson III et al. (2020) 
Negative stereotyping of luxuryBias against luxury consumption and its current users or buyersBryson et al. (2021) 
UnsustainabilityAdopting production processes that emit significant pollutants, exploit the workforce, or generate other negative social externalities disproportionate to the scale of operationAmatulli et al. (2020, 2021) 

Source(s): Table by author

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal