An overview of the antecedents and moderators of SFR research in the luxury context
| Category | Construct | Operating definition | Representative literature support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer-related | Attribute evaluation/Pre-purchase effort | The level of cognitive effort expended in terms of comparing different available alternatives for satisfying the same consumption need(s) | Bolfing (1989), Keaveney et al. (2007) |
| Consumer activism | Awareness and consciousness of one’s responsibility to proactively pursue rights as a consumer | Bolfing (1989) | |
| Country-of-origin perceptions | Beliefs about the perceived quality of a country’s goods and services as shaped by its culture, policies, and workforce skills | Bryson et al. (2021) | |
| Demographics | Individual characteristics such as age, gender, education, and occupation | Bolfing (1989), Morgeson III et al. (2020) | |
| Envy | Perceived lack of some attribute of positive valence seen as present in someone else, coupled with the wish to have the same | Sundie et al. (2009) | |
| Financial perceived risk | The consumers’ intrinsic fear of a product or service not matching the monetary sacrifice paid for it | Mrad et al. (2022) | |
| Hostility | Feelings of perceived injustice, resentment and anger | Sundie et al. (2009) | |
| Image congruence/Relation to ideal self-concept/Value expressiveness | Match or coupling between a desired image of oneself often shaped by social and cultural norms and the product/service brand image | Han and Hyun (2013), Kashif et al., (2021), Ward and Dahl (2014) | |
| Personality | Individual traits such as assertiveness, self-control, and extraversion, which are quite stable yet malleable | Bolfing (1989) | |
| Firm-related | Corporate social (ir)responsibility/Deceptive practices/Unethical practices | The inability of some firms to go beyond treating social and environmental responsibility as a promotional exercise | Bryson et al. (2021), Carrigan et al. (2013), Mrad et al. (2022) |
| Employee’s conspicuous consumption cue | Employee’s display of items and possessions symbolic of luxuriousness | Wu, So, Xiong, and King (2019) | |
| Employee empowerment | Enabling employees to exercise discretion in their work, particularly aspects related to customer-facing tasks | Kandampully and Duddy (2001) | |
| Employee’s physical attractiveness | Consumers’ perception of how attractive the employee is, in sensory terms | Wu et al. (2019) | |
| Hard sell | Exclusive emphasis on selling rather than matching the product or service to customer requirements | Mrad et al. (2022) | |
| Provider responsiveness | Systems and processes to extract complaints and eagerness to resolve them | Bolfing (1989) | |
| Service guarantee | A commitment that the firm will be liable to compensate in case of service levels falling below a certain threshold | Kandampully and Duddy (2001) | |
| Third-party certification | An attestation by a neutral party to the efficacy of a firm’s goods or services | Jun et al. (2017) | |
| Uninformed employees | Service employees not having requisite information about the firm’s offerings and processes | Lin and Chen (2013) | |
| Wellness attributes | Product/service features that help toward holistic physical and mental well-being, e.g., by facilitating stress management, nutritional awareness, physical fitness, and social sensitivity | Park et al. (2020) | |
| Consumer-firm exchange and relationship related | Brand hate | Intense negative emotions directed at the brand | Kashif et al. (2021) |
| Dark triad in brand personality | Machiavellianism, psychopathy and narcissism as three established facets of personality that are generally considered negative in valence | Ahn (2023) | |
| Deficient sensory experience | Lack of perceived enjoyment that can be had from employing consumption as a means to gratifying our senses | Mrad et al. (2022) | |
| Influencer-brand poor fit | When an endorser is dissimilar to and not well matched with the brand endorsed | Qian and Park (2021) | |
| Infringement | A situation when another individual or group tries without concurrence to enter into a space that belongs to the person or group under reference | Lee and Kim (2020) | |
| Likeability of non-core users | People whom the referent consumers perceive as non-loyal to a brand | Lee and Kim (2020) | |
| Massification | Attempting to make a product or service available to the masses rather than select consumers | Mrad et al. (2022) | |
| Nature of failure (Outcome/Process) | Outcome failures involve a deficiency in the delivery of core service, whereas process failures are deficient in the mode of provision or employees’ behavior | Wu et al. (2019) | |
| Overpricing perception | Charging above the expected fair price or beyond the price communicated pre-purchase | Brochado et al. (2019), Kwon, Lee, and Bowen (2022), Sahin et al. (2017) | |
| Poor interaction quality | Below-par service delivery in terms of the attitude of front-line employees and the efficacy of customer service | Bryson et al. (2013) | |
| Prior experience with the firm | Customer’s history of interactions with the same firm and resultant cumulative satisfaction | Morgeson III et al. (2020) | |
| Service failure severity | The extent of perceived harm, which could be in monetary as well as psychological terms | Bolfing (1989) | |
| Service quality | Aggregate-level perceptions of service performance, including tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy | Dinçer and Alrawadieh (2017), Sahin et al. (2017), Zheng et al. (2009) | |
| Trust | The expectation that the firm will provide goods and services of high quality, i.e., the firm is seen as dependable | Jun et al. (2017) | |
| Wait time | Time spent before the service delivery begins | Kwon et al. (2022) | |
| Broader market factors | Consumer nationality | The country where the consumption market is located | Prayag and Ryan (2012) |
| Culture | Consumption differences across markets, as shaped by broader social norms, e.g., power distance, uncertainty avoidance, time orientation, collectivism, masculinity, and restraint | Amatulli et al. (2021), Ying et al. (2020) | |
| Economic and industry factors | Macro aspects such as aggregate growth and consumer spending and industry-specific variations, e.g., in the degree of competition | Morgeson III et al. (2020) | |
| Negative stereotyping of luxury | Bias against luxury consumption and its current users or buyers | Bryson et al. (2021) | |
| Unsustainability | Adopting production processes that emit significant pollutants, exploit the workforce, or generate other negative social externalities disproportionate to the scale of operation | Amatulli et al. (2020, 2021) |
| Category | Construct | Operating definition | Representative literature support |
|---|---|---|---|
| Consumer-related | Attribute evaluation/Pre-purchase effort | The level of cognitive effort expended in terms of comparing different available alternatives for satisfying the same consumption need(s) | |
| Consumer activism | Awareness and consciousness of one’s responsibility to proactively pursue rights as a consumer | ||
| Country-of-origin perceptions | Beliefs about the perceived quality of a country’s goods and services as shaped by its culture, policies, and workforce skills | ||
| Demographics | Individual characteristics such as age, gender, education, and occupation | ||
| Envy | Perceived lack of some attribute of positive valence seen as present in someone else, coupled with the wish to have the same | ||
| Financial perceived risk | The consumers’ intrinsic fear of a product or service not matching the monetary sacrifice paid for it | ||
| Hostility | Feelings of perceived injustice, resentment and anger | ||
| Image congruence/Relation to ideal self-concept/Value expressiveness | Match or coupling between a desired image of oneself often shaped by social and cultural norms and the product/service brand image | ||
| Personality | Individual traits such as assertiveness, self-control, and extraversion, which are quite stable yet malleable | ||
| Firm-related | Corporate social (ir)responsibility/Deceptive practices/Unethical practices | The inability of some firms to go beyond treating social and environmental responsibility as a promotional exercise | |
| Employee’s conspicuous consumption cue | Employee’s display of items and possessions symbolic of luxuriousness | ||
| Employee empowerment | Enabling employees to exercise discretion in their work, particularly aspects related to customer-facing tasks | ||
| Employee’s physical attractiveness | Consumers’ perception of how attractive the employee is, in sensory terms | ||
| Hard sell | Exclusive emphasis on selling rather than matching the product or service to customer requirements | ||
| Provider responsiveness | Systems and processes to extract complaints and eagerness to resolve them | ||
| Service guarantee | A commitment that the firm will be liable to compensate in case of service levels falling below a certain threshold | ||
| Third-party certification | An attestation by a neutral party to the efficacy of a firm’s goods or services | ||
| Uninformed employees | Service employees not having requisite information about the firm’s offerings and processes | ||
| Wellness attributes | Product/service features that help toward holistic physical and mental well-being, e.g., by facilitating stress management, nutritional awareness, physical fitness, and social sensitivity | ||
| Consumer-firm exchange and relationship related | Brand hate | Intense negative emotions directed at the brand | |
| Dark triad in brand personality | Machiavellianism, psychopathy and narcissism as three established facets of personality that are generally considered negative in valence | ||
| Deficient sensory experience | Lack of perceived enjoyment that can be had from employing consumption as a means to gratifying our senses | ||
| Influencer-brand poor fit | When an endorser is dissimilar to and not well matched with the brand endorsed | ||
| Infringement | A situation when another individual or group tries without concurrence to enter into a space that belongs to the person or group under reference | ||
| Likeability of non-core users | People whom the referent consumers perceive as non-loyal to a brand | ||
| Massification | Attempting to make a product or service available to the masses rather than select consumers | ||
| Nature of failure (Outcome/Process) | Outcome failures involve a deficiency in the delivery of core service, whereas process failures are deficient in the mode of provision or employees’ behavior | ||
| Overpricing perception | Charging above the expected fair price or beyond the price communicated pre-purchase | ||
| Poor interaction quality | Below-par service delivery in terms of the attitude of front-line employees and the efficacy of customer service | ||
| Prior experience with the firm | Customer’s history of interactions with the same firm and resultant cumulative satisfaction | ||
| Service failure severity | The extent of perceived harm, which could be in monetary as well as psychological terms | ||
| Service quality | Aggregate-level perceptions of service performance, including tangibles, reliability, responsiveness, assurance, and empathy | ||
| Trust | The expectation that the firm will provide goods and services of high quality, i.e., the firm is seen as dependable | ||
| Wait time | Time spent before the service delivery begins | ||
| Broader market factors | Consumer nationality | The country where the consumption market is located | |
| Culture | Consumption differences across markets, as shaped by broader social norms, e.g., power distance, uncertainty avoidance, time orientation, collectivism, masculinity, and restraint | ||
| Economic and industry factors | Macro aspects such as aggregate growth and consumer spending and industry-specific variations, e.g., in the degree of competition | ||
| Negative stereotyping of luxury | Bias against luxury consumption and its current users or buyers | ||
| Unsustainability | Adopting production processes that emit significant pollutants, exploit the workforce, or generate other negative social externalities disproportionate to the scale of operation |
Source(s): Table by author
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.