Table 3.

Baseline regression results

(1)(2)(3)(4)
VariableGINGINGINGIN2
STFE33.2463*** (4.00)163.8634*** (4.54)19.7601*** (3.55)14.9912*** (3.87)
STFE_1  12.6929*** (4.61) 
STFE_2  14.2755*** (2.98) 
FDI2.1386*** (2.86)1.7948 (1.54)1.9184*** (3.50)1.8315*** (3.19)
EG2.4308*** (5.45)1.8716*** (5.78)2.6274*** (5.75)1.5841*** (5.77)
IN−0.0046 (−0.21)−0.0088 (−0.36)−0.0006 (−0.04)−0.0008 (−0.06)
IS2.2088*** (4.03)0.8825 (1.18)2.0977*** (3.74)1.3154*** (4.00)
IND0.0003 (0.82)−0.0001 (−0.34)0.0003 (1.04)0.0003 (1.34)
Cons−9.0224*** (−5.93)−9.568*** (−20.22)−10.1534*** (−6.30)−5.8494*** (−6.38)
YearYESYESYESYES
CityYESYESYESYES
Cragg-Donald wald F statistic
Wald F statistic
 297.856  
Stock-Yogo weak ID
Test critical values
 16.38 (10%)  
N4,2604,2603,6924,260
R20.512 0.5340.550

Note(s):z statistics in parentheses (2), while t statistics in other parentheses;

***p < 0.01,

**p < 0.05 and

*p < 0.1

Source(s): Authors’ own creation

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal