Table 3. Multiple hierarchical... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3.

Multiple hierarchical regression analysis of intention to engage in climate change mitigation behavior

Behavior	Willingness to mitigate climate change			Change dietary habit			Change transportation mode			Use less air conditioning			Replace old appliances with energy-saving ones			Purchase green products
Sample	n = 385			n = 378			n = 382			n = 385			n = 385			n = 385
Model	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C
Lack of perceived necessity	−0.28***	−0.09	−0.11	−0.04	0.08	0.08	−0.04	0.06	0.06	−0.14*	−0.02	−0.04	−0.18*	−0.01	−0.01	−0.33***	−0.12	−0.11
Cost	−0.20**	−0.28***	−0.26***	−0.28***	−0.33***	−0.32***	−0.09	−0.11	−0.14	−0.23**	−0.27***	−0.26***	−0.20**	−0.24**	−0.25**	0.02	−0.04	−0.06
Efficacy	−0.16**	−0.06	−0.06	−0.16*	−0.06	−0.06	−0.17*	−0.16*	−0.15*	−0.17**	−0.13*	−0.13*	−0.03	−0.00	−0.03	−0.12	−0.07	−0.11
Lack of opportunity	0.12*	0.05	0.04	−0.00	−0.05	−0.03	−0.04	−0.07	−0.02	0.08	0.04	0.04	0.15**	0.11	0.11	0.10	0.05	0.06
Risk perception	–	0.37***	0.38***	–	0.34***	0.27***	–	0.08	0.10	–	0.15*	0.14*	–	0.15*	0.15**	–	0.23***	0.24***
Environmental attitude	–	−0.02	−0.03	–	−0.10	−0.08	–	0.09	0.09	–	0.05	0.04	–	0.12*	0.13*	–	0.11	0.11*
Young	–	–	−0.01	–	–	0.01	–	–	−0.01	–	–	−0.14	–	–	0.11	–	–	0.26**
Middle age	–	–	0.05	–	–	−0.02	–	–	0.05	–	–	−0.04	–	–	0.15	–	–	0.33***
Female	–	–	−0.06	–	–	0.10*	–	–	−0.03	–	–	−0.01	–	–	−0.06	–	–	0.01
College or below	–	–	0.01	–	–	0.06	–	–	0.11*	–	–	0.04	–	–	0.02	–	–	0.02
Married	–	–	−0.13	–	–	0.00	–	–	0.02	–	–	0.14	–	–	−0.05	–	–	−0.15*
No children	–	–	0.11	–	–	−0.08	–	–	0.07	–	–	0.04	–	–	0.11	–	–	0.17*
Non-green transportation	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	−0.40***	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Non-vegetarian	–	–	–	–	–	−0.26***	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Adjusted R²	0.26	0.35	0.36	0.17	0.24	0.32	0.08	0.08	0.25	0.19	0.20	0.21	0.10	0.12	0.13	0.12	0.17	0.20

Behavior	Willingness to mitigate climate change			Change dietary habit			Change transportation mode			Use less air conditioning			Replace old appliances with energy-saving ones			Purchase green products
Sample	n = 385			n = 378			n = 382			n = 385			n = 385			n = 385
Model	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C	A	B	C
Lack of perceived necessity	−0.28***	−0.09	−0.11	−0.04	0.08	0.08	−0.04	0.06	0.06	−0.14*	−0.02	−0.04	−0.18*	−0.01	−0.01	−0.33***	−0.12	−0.11
Cost	−0.20**	−0.28***	−0.26***	−0.28***	−0.33***	−0.32***	−0.09	−0.11	−0.14	−0.23**	−0.27***	−0.26***	−0.20**	−0.24**	−0.25**	0.02	−0.04	−0.06
Efficacy	−0.16**	−0.06	−0.06	−0.16*	−0.06	−0.06	−0.17*	−0.16*	−0.15*	−0.17**	−0.13*	−0.13*	−0.03	−0.00	−0.03	−0.12	−0.07	−0.11
Lack of opportunity	0.12*	0.05	0.04	−0.00	−0.05	−0.03	−0.04	−0.07	−0.02	0.08	0.04	0.04	0.15**	0.11	0.11	0.10	0.05	0.06
Risk perception	–	0.37***	0.38***	–	0.34***	0.27***	–	0.08	0.10	–	0.15*	0.14*	–	0.15*	0.15**	–	0.23***	0.24***
Environmental attitude	–	−0.02	−0.03	–	−0.10	−0.08	–	0.09	0.09	–	0.05	0.04	–	0.12*	0.13*	–	0.11	0.11*
Young	–	–	−0.01	–	–	0.01	–	–	−0.01	–	–	−0.14	–	–	0.11	–	–	0.26**
Middle age	–	–	0.05	–	–	−0.02	–	–	0.05	–	–	−0.04	–	–	0.15	–	–	0.33***
Female	–	–	−0.06	–	–	0.10*	–	–	−0.03	–	–	−0.01	–	–	−0.06	–	–	0.01
College or below	–	–	0.01	–	–	0.06	–	–	0.11*	–	–	0.04	–	–	0.02	–	–	0.02
Married	–	–	−0.13	–	–	0.00	–	–	0.02	–	–	0.14	–	–	−0.05	–	–	−0.15*
No children	–	–	0.11	–	–	−0.08	–	–	0.07	–	–	0.04	–	–	0.11	–	–	0.17*
Non-green transportation	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	−0.40***	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Non-vegetarian	–	–	–	–	–	−0.26***	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–	–
Adjusted R²	0.26	0.35	0.36	0.17	0.24	0.32	0.08	0.08	0.25	0.19	0.20	0.21	0.10	0.12	0.13	0.12	0.17	0.20

Note(s):

Values in cells are standardized regression coefficients. *p < 0.05; **p < 0.01; ***p < 0.001

Source(s): Authors’ own creation