Table 4 Profit by country or coalition...

Table 4

Profit by country or coalition (NPV in $€ 10^{\land} 6$ ) for three simulated unit cost cases.

Costs	Singletons			Coalition	Coalitions and the corresponding free rider next to the right					Grand coalition
	{1}	{2}	{3}	{12}	{3}	{13}	{2}	{23}	{1}	{123}
The partial coalitions and the grand coalition applies a harvest control rule
Low	84	144	265	98	312	169	159	256	133	850
Identical	142	142	142	187	272	187	272	187	272	732
High	211	153	72	278	181	218	237	169	303	732
The partial coalitions and the grand coalition applies a fixed F strategy
Low	84	144	265	241	392	392	241	422	211	834
Identical	142	142	142	285	285	285	285	285	285	714
High	211	153	72	360	189	313	254	254	313	714

Costs	Singletons			Coalition	Coalitions and the corresponding free rider next to the right					Grand coalition
	{1}	{2}	{3}	{12}	{3}	{13}	{2}	{23}	{1}	{123}
The partial coalitions and the grand coalition applies a harvest control rule
Low	84	144	265	98	312	169	159	256	133	850
Identical	142	142	142	187	272	187	272	187	272	732
High	211	153	72	278	181	218	237	169	303	732
The partial coalitions and the grand coalition applies a fixed F strategy
Low	84	144	265	241	392	392	241	422	211	834
Identical	142	142	142	285	285	285	285	285	285	714
High	211	153	72	360	189	313	254	254	313	714

Partial coalitions and the grand coalition may or may not adopt harvest control rule. Singletons have only one strategy option, i.e., a fixed $F$ strategy. singleton or as two-player coalitions. Thus, the grand coalition is stable in the cooperative stability sense. The result holds for all tested fishing cost scenarios and harvesting strategy combinations.

[ViewLarge]

Sharing Unavailable