Table 3.

Barriers to artificial intelligence adoption in the public sector

The TOE categoryFirst-order conceptsSecond-order themesAggregate dimensions
Technology-related barriers
  • Lack of basic understanding regarding the potential AI applications

  • Old thinking models or skills

Technological competencesTechnological competence gap
Organization-related barriers
  • Lack of basic understanding regarding the opportunities of AI value propositions and their use cases

  • Service design skills for AI development

  • Competence and continuous learning

  • Lack of time

  • Lack of funding

  • Lack of key resources

  • Seeing the AI project difficult, slow down starting new AI adoption initiatives

  • Different perspectives

  • Negative attitude toward AI adoption

  • Negative thinking models

  • Poor prior experiences slow down starting new AI adoption initiatives

  • The prudence of officials and issues of responsibility

  • Silo-like thinking

  • Crossing the organizational boundaries

  • Managers’ understanding of how to apply AI

  • Change of operating culture

Design competencesInsufficient AI capabilities
Lack of resourcesManagement challenges for AI adoption
Conflicting expectations
Attitude
Working culture
Leadership
Environment-related barriers
  • Challenges regarding understanding different stakeholders hinder cross-functional cooperation

  • The interest of different actors in the ecosystem

  • Transparency rules, trustworthiness of AI, and data protection slow AI adoption

  • Legal obstacles to trying

  • Security issues

  • Humans need to make final decisions according to the law

Cross-functional cooperationNetworked collaboration
Putting regulations and security into practiceApplication of regulation
Source(s): Created by the author; main TOE categories adapted from DePietro et al. (1990) 

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options