| Stakeholders of AI Tools in HRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employer | Decision Makers | Decision Target | HR Professionals | |
| Perceived Gains |
|
|
|
|
| Perceived Losses |
|
|
|
|
| Risk Propensity Trend | Positive | Positive | Negative | Mixed, many moderators |
| Stakeholders of AI Tools in HRM | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Employer | Decision Makers | Decision Target | HR Professionals | |
| Perceived Gains | Increased competitiveness in hiring Decision-making speed Employer branding benefits | Reduced responsibility for HR decisions More time for other tasks | Clear rules and high consistency in HR decisions Avoidance of decision biases (attractiveness, liking, etc.) Voice Adaptions of individual working conditions | Relief from routine tasks, more time for other tasks Support for complex tasks and better decision-making Advancing own skills Reduced responsibility for some HR decisions |
| Perceived Losses | Monetary investments Non-financial costs Potential poor or biased decisions Potential lawsuits | Potential displacement by technologies Reduced control over decisions | Opaque and potential unfair decision making, algorithmic reductionism Loss of privacy and control over personal data | Loss of professional identity Learning costs Change management processes Potential displacement by technologies |
| Risk Propensity Trend | Positive | Positive | Negative | Mixed, many moderators |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.