Table 2.

Comparison of indigenous intellectual property and cultural rights examples

Community and regionCore issueLegal/policy instrumentOutcome and relevance
Huna tlingit (Alaska, USA)Recognition of customary harvest inside a protected area (gull egg collection in Glacier Bay National Park)US Public Law 113–142 (2014); co-management planning with National Park Service (NPS, 2025)Legally sanctioned, culturally vital practice resumed. Demonstrates how traditional ecological knowledge and indigenous stewardship can reshape federal conservation law
Sami (Finland)Protection of duodji (handicrafts) and sacred symbols from misappropriation (Mattila, 2018)Sami Duodji collective/certification trademarks; Norwegian IPO trademark invalidation (2020)Provides consumer with authenticity guarantee; legal precedent prevents privatisation of sacred symbols. A model for safeguarding intangible heritage
Pauktuutit inuit women’s association (Canada)Misuse and imitation of traditional amauti (inuit women’s parka) designs; lack of recognition for seamstresses and regional design diversityNational registry/inventory of seamstresses and designs; envisioned collective trademark/mark of authenticity shared among Inuit producers (Bird, 2002)Strengthened cultural and economic recognition of inuit women’s artistry; proposed a seal of guarantee to protect authenticity and assist consumers in identifying genuine inuit products

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal