Research methods, procedures and purposes
| Methodological aspect | Procedure adopted | Purpose | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enabler identification | Literature review + expert confirmation | Content validity | Alka et al. (2025b), Agarwal et al. (2021) |
| Expert selection | Purposive and snowball sampling with inclusion/exclusion criteria | Judgment quality | Alka et al. (2025a, b) |
| Data collection | Structured interviews | Consistency and depth | Alka et al. (2025a), Sreenivasan and Suresh (2024) |
| Questionnaire design | Pairwise comparison using a 5-point Likert scale | Reliability of judgments | Alka et al. (2025a, b, c) |
| Disagreement handling | Majority consensus and interpretive clarification | Judgment consistency | Alka et al. (2025b) |
| Sample size | 12 experts, based on saturation | Theoretical saturation | Alka et al. (2025c), Kaur et al. (2016), Dalvi-Esfahani et al. (2025), Kharb et al. (2024) |
| Model validation | Expert review + MICMAC classification | Structural understanding through confirmation | Alka et al. (2025a, b, c), Agarwal et al. (2021) |
| Methodological aspect | Procedure adopted | Purpose | References |
|---|---|---|---|
| Enabler identification | Literature review + expert confirmation | Content validity | |
| Expert selection | Purposive and snowball sampling with inclusion/exclusion criteria | Judgment quality | |
| Data collection | Structured interviews | Consistency and depth | |
| Questionnaire design | Pairwise comparison using a 5-point Likert scale | Reliability of judgments | |
| Disagreement handling | Majority consensus and interpretive clarification | Judgment consistency | |
| Sample size | 12 experts, based on saturation | Theoretical saturation | |
| Model validation | Expert review + MICMAC classification | Structural understanding through confirmation |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.