Summary of key findings
| Aspect | ChatGPT | Gamma | Autopilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | Highest rated; intuitive and user-friendly | More complex; lowest ease of use | Moderate; simple but limited in scope |
| Accuracy | Mixed results; sometimes less precise | Strongest in accuracy; multiple output options | Moderate; less precise than Gamma |
| Citation adherence | Weak; frequent APA-style errors | Limited; incomplete citations | Weak; minimal adherence |
| Arabic language handling | Struggled significantly with Arabic | Better performance with Arabic | Moderate handling of Arabic |
| Time/effort savings | Significant time savings reported | Effective but restricted by the free version limits | Significant time savings |
| Multimedia integration | Supports images/templates | Strong multimedia features | Very limited (primarily text-based) |
| Overall student view | Easy to use but unreliable for citations | Accurate and effective but less flexible to use | Simple and useful but less flexible |
| Aspect | ChatGPT | Gamma | Autopilot |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ease of use | Highest rated; intuitive and user-friendly | More complex; lowest ease of use | Moderate; simple but limited in scope |
| Accuracy | Mixed results; sometimes less precise | Strongest in accuracy; multiple output options | Moderate; less precise than Gamma |
| Citation adherence | Weak; frequent APA-style errors | Limited; incomplete citations | Weak; minimal adherence |
| Arabic language handling | Struggled significantly with Arabic | Better performance with Arabic | Moderate handling of Arabic |
| Time/effort savings | Significant time savings reported | Effective but restricted by the free version limits | Significant time savings |
| Multimedia integration | Supports images/templates | Strong multimedia features | Very limited (primarily text-based) |
| Overall student view | Easy to use but unreliable for citations | Accurate and effective but less flexible to use | Simple and useful but less flexible |