Importance of considerations for not going to a shelter, 2017 Hurricane Irma, St. Kitts (201 respondents)
| Reasons for not going to a shelter | Not an important consideration (%) | Important consideration (%) | NI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Felt safe in chosen residence | 32 (15.9) | 167 (83.1) | 2 (1.0) |
| Did not want to be dependent on RUSVM/govt | 142 (70.6) | 57 (28.4) | 2 (1.0) |
| Did not want to be around lots of other people | 89 (44.3) | 106 (52.7) | 6 (3.0) |
| Did not want to bring pet(s) to shelter | 111 (55.2) | 83 (41.3) | 7 (3.5) |
| Did not think the storm would be bad | 140 (69.7) | 56 (27.9) | 5(2.5) |
| Reasons for not going to a shelter | Not an important consideration (%) | Important consideration (%) | NI (%) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Felt safe in chosen residence | 32 (15.9) | 167 (83.1) | 2 (1.0) |
| Did not want to be dependent on RUSVM/govt | 142 (70.6) | 57 (28.4) | 2 (1.0) |
| Did not want to be around lots of other people | 89 (44.3) | 106 (52.7) | 6 (3.0) |
| Did not want to bring pet(s) to shelter | 111 (55.2) | 83 (41.3) | 7 (3.5) |
| Did not think the storm would be bad | 140 (69.7) | 56 (27.9) | 5(2.5) |
Note(s): Not important consideration includes not a consideration, considered a little and not a major consideration
Important consideration includes a very important consideration
NI means not indicated by the respondent
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.