Table 6

Comprehensive ablation study results

Component removedTactical accuracyLatency (ms)Sample efficiencyFootballBasketballRugbyStatistical significance
Complete Framework87.8% ± 1.2%30.9 ± 2.1500 matches87.8%85.3%80.7%Baseline
Hierarchical Decomposition69.5% ± 2.1%187.2 ± 15.32,100 matches68.1%71.2%69.1%p < 0.001
Dynamic Graph Construction73.1% ± 1.8%119.8 ± 8.71,350 matches72.4%74.1%72.8%p < 0.001
Cross-Attention Bridge75.4% ± 1.6%65.1 ± 4.2980 matches74.8%76.3%75.1%p < 0.001
Adaptive Computation84.6% ± 1.4%284.7 ± 21.8520 matches84.1%85.2%84.4%p < 0.001
Opponent Modeling (IRL)71.0% ± 2.3%42.3 ± 3.11,680 matches70.2%72.1%70.7%p < 0.001
Uncertainty Estimation82.3% ± 1.7%29.1 ± 1.8580 matches81.8%83.1%82.0%p < 0.01
Multi-scale Reward Structure76.2% ± 2.0%45.7 ± 3.81,150 matches75.6%77.1%76.0%p < 0.001

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal