Table 3 Comparison of different data... | Emerald Publishing

Table 3

Comparison of different data imputation methods by RMSE and MAE with eICU dataset

Missing Rate	RMSE							MAE
Missing Rate	Zero	Mean	KNN [20]	Brits [3]	ReMasker [8]	CSDI [25]	MTDM	Zero	Mean	KNN [20]	Brits [3]	ReMasker [8]	CSDI [25]	MTDM
10%	1.024	1.024	1.008	0.877	0.743	1.442	0.824	0.703	0.704	0.848	0.642	0.501	0.227	0.252
30%	0.991	0.992	0.997	0.870	0.837	1.230	0.604	0.694	0.693	0.844	0.631	0.553	0.245	0.244
50%	0.990	0.990	1.000	0.858	0.964	0.557	0.581	0.689	0.689	0.843	0.635	0.649	0.215	0.234
70%	0.996	0.996	1.001	0.864	0.997	0.749	0.661	0.692	0.691	0.845	0.636	0.674	0.233	0.249
90%	1.001	1.001	1.000	0.835	1.003	0.757	0.736	0.694	0.694	0.844	0.627	0.692	0.327	0.260

Missing Rate	RMSE							MAE
Missing Rate	Zero	Mean	KNN [20]	Brits [3]	ReMasker [8]	CSDI [25]	MTDM	Zero	Mean	KNN [20]	Brits [3]	ReMasker [8]	CSDI [25]	MTDM
10%	1.024	1.024	1.008	0.877	0.743	1.442	0.824	0.703	0.704	0.848	0.642	0.501	0.227	0.252
30%	0.991	0.992	0.997	0.870	0.837	1.230	0.604	0.694	0.693	0.844	0.631	0.553	0.245	0.244
50%	0.990	0.990	1.000	0.858	0.964	0.557	0.581	0.689	0.689	0.843	0.635	0.649	0.215	0.234
70%	0.996	0.996	1.001	0.864	0.997	0.749	0.661	0.692	0.691	0.845	0.636	0.674	0.233	0.249
90%	1.001	1.001	1.000	0.835	1.003	0.757	0.736	0.694	0.694	0.844	0.627	0.692	0.327	0.260