Table 4

Factor structure for internal audit quality

Outer loadingsVIFαCRAVE
IDThe board/council approve the internal audit work plans0.7461.3430.7000.810.517
Internal auditors have the strength to say no to instances that lead to fraud0.7441.341   
The internal auditor general of the government reviews the internal audit reports0.7281.416   
The board/council always approves the internal audit budget0.6541.198   
ICAlways exhibit wide knowledge of the international standards for the professional performance of internal audit0.7611.6960.8080.8620.510
Adequately document their findings0.7201.543   
Always advise the board on anti-fraud measures0.7091.526   
Are able to analyse complex information0.7001.493   
Regularly exhibit good interpersonal interactions0.7001.551   
Regularly report suspected fraud cases0.6951.419   
CPSInternal audit work plans are adequately executed0.8191.4590.7000.8190.601
Quality assurance is conducted on the internal audit activities0.7731.405   
The head of internal audit periodically inform the board/council of issues regarding the internal audit independence0.7311.184   
UIFAdherence to the ethical code is emphasized in the internal audit reports0.7531.5420.7730.8460.524
Risks of fraud have been reduced due to regular internal audits0.7481.822   
Compliance with entity policies is emphasised in internal audit reports0.7221.458   
Productivity has improved due to internal audit recommendations0.7081.649   
Strict accountability is emphasised by internal auditors0.6891.411   

Note(s): HTMT Ratio: IC <-> CPS = 0.646; ID <-> CPS = 0.467; ID <-> IC = 0.591; PU <->0.531; PU <-> 0.510; PU <-> 0.432

CR = Composite Reliability; ID = Internal Audit Independence; IC = Internal Audit Competence; CPS = Compliance with Professional Standards; UIF = Usefulness of Internal Audit Function

Source(s): Primary data

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal