Table 7

Structural model results

PathsβStd deviationt-valuesp-valuesPercentile bootstrap 95% confidence interval
LowerUpper
Direct effects
IAQ → FMT0.2000.0692.9100.0020.0830.310
IAQ → EB0.2770.0803.4540.0000.1410.405
EB → FMT0.4690.0617.7190.0000.3690.568
Institution size → FMT0.1570.1930.8160.207−0.1630.474
Institution age → FMT0.1500.1640.9120.181−0.1180.422
Institution category → FMT−0.4190.1353.1120.001−0.644−0.197
Gender of accounting officer → FMT0.0670.1590.4230.336−0.2010.324
Indirect effects
IAQ → EB → FMT0.1300.0432.9930.0010.0620.204
Total effects
IAQ → FMT0.3300.0734.5080.0000.2080.447
IAQ → EB0.2770.0803.4540.0000.1410.405
EB → FMT0.4690.0617.7190.0000.3690.568
Institution size → FMT0.1570.1930.8160.207−0.1630.474
Institution category → FMT−0.4190.1353.1120.001−0.644−0.197
Institution age → FMT0.1500.1640.9120.181−0.1180.422
Gender of accounting officer → FMT0.0670.1590.4230.336−0.2010.324

Note(s): R2 = 0.377; Q2 = 0.167; SRMR = 0.058; NFI = 0.749. VIFs: IAQ → FMT = 1.129; IAQ → EB = 1.000; EB → FMT = 1.152; Institution size → FMT = 1.169; Institution age → FMT = 1.117; Institution Category → FMT = 1.199; Gender of Accounting Officer → FMT = 1.018

FMT = Fraud Management; IAQ = Internal Audit Quality; EB = Ethical Behaviour

Source(s): Primary data

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal