Summary of key studies about the benefits of SCQM4.0
| Authors | Methods | SCQM4.0 practices/concepts studied | Outputs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Li et al. (2020) | Conceptual/Exploratory (Inferred from focus on challenges and opportunities, method not explicitly detailed as empirical or specific review type in provided excerpts) | Blockchain for SCQM. Challenges and opportunities in the context of open manufacturing and industrial IoT | Focused on challenges and opportunities of using blockchain for SCQM |
| Ben-Daya et al. (2020) | Literature review, Systematic review. Augmented with bibliometric and network analysis (citation, co-citation). Used BibExcel and Gephi. Content analysis | Role of IoT in food SCQM. Enabling technologies like blockchain. Smart packaging. Traceability. Quality control tools | Review of the role of IoT in food SCQM. Identified potential, challenges, and role of IoT and blockchain. Identified key themes (traceability, sensor technology, packaging). Summarized findings on smart packaging and blockchain applications |
| Frederico et al. (2023) | Survey, quantitative analysis (Cronbach’s alpha, AVE, CR, MSV, ASV, Regression, ANOVA, SEM) | Disruptive technologies (CPSs, IoT, CC, BDA, CSS), Interoperability, SCP's performance (Integration, Collaboration, Efficiency, Transparency, Responsiveness) and Profitability | Confirmed relationships between disruptive technologies and collaboration, integration, responsiveness, transparency, and profitability. Moderating role of interoperability and impact on efficiency require further exploration |
| Faisal (2023) | Mixed-method (ISM using expert consultation, PLS-SEM using survey questionnaire) | I4.0 technologies, Consumer awareness, Coopetition, Regulatory interventions, SC redesign, Servitization, Stakeholders' contribution, Collaboration, Knowledge and skills, Circular performance of SC | ISM model representing hierarchy and interrelationships among variables. PLS-SEM results testing the mediating role of I4.0 technologies. Established that I4.0 technologies play an important role in achieving circularity |
| de Oliveira-Dias et al. (2023) | Questionnaire development, quantitative analysis | Lean Supply Chain, Agile Supply Chain, I4.0 base technologies | Results from Factor Analysis for I4.0 base technologies. Support for the view that dynamic capabilities could be generated through collaboration with SC partners |
| Nguyen et al. (2023) | A Systematic Literature Review followed the PRISMA 2020 procedure. The analysis methods included descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis. A structured interview with academicians and a Q-sort method with managers were used to validate the proposed maturity model | Disruptive Technologies, Infrastructure Practices, Transparency, Integration, Interoperability, Collaboration, Performance measurement, Efficiency, Flexibility, and Responsiveness, Environmental Performance Metrics | A four-stage Circular Economic-based SCQM 4.0 practice route (incidental, intentional, integrated, and optimized) for firms to adopt towards achieving a Circular Economy |
| Duong Thi Binh et al. (2024) | Comprehensive literature review | Integration of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) with SCQM for fostering sustainability in a circular economy (CE), including tools like IoT, blockchain, traceability, and smart packaging | Developed a comprehensive conceptual framework for SCQM4.0 aimed at achieving holistic sustainability objectives within a circular economy, encompassing economic, social, and environmental dimensions |
| Authors | Methods | SCQM4.0 practices/concepts studied | Outputs |
|---|---|---|---|
| Conceptual/Exploratory (Inferred from focus on challenges and opportunities, method not explicitly detailed as empirical or specific review type in provided excerpts) | Blockchain for SCQM. Challenges and opportunities in the context of open manufacturing and industrial IoT | Focused on challenges and opportunities of using blockchain for SCQM | |
| Literature review, Systematic review. Augmented with bibliometric and network analysis (citation, co-citation). Used BibExcel and Gephi. Content analysis | Role of IoT in food SCQM. Enabling technologies like blockchain. Smart packaging. Traceability. Quality control tools | Review of the role of IoT in food SCQM. Identified potential, challenges, and role of IoT and blockchain. Identified key themes (traceability, sensor technology, packaging). Summarized findings on smart packaging and blockchain applications | |
| Survey, quantitative analysis (Cronbach’s alpha, AVE, CR, MSV, ASV, Regression, ANOVA, SEM) | Disruptive technologies (CPSs, IoT, CC, BDA, CSS), Interoperability, SCP's performance (Integration, Collaboration, Efficiency, Transparency, Responsiveness) and Profitability | Confirmed relationships between disruptive technologies and collaboration, integration, responsiveness, transparency, and profitability. Moderating role of interoperability and impact on efficiency require further exploration | |
| Mixed-method (ISM using expert consultation, PLS-SEM using survey questionnaire) | I4.0 technologies, Consumer awareness, Coopetition, Regulatory interventions, SC redesign, Servitization, Stakeholders' contribution, Collaboration, Knowledge and skills, Circular performance of SC | ISM model representing hierarchy and interrelationships among variables. PLS-SEM results testing the mediating role of I4.0 technologies. Established that I4.0 technologies play an important role in achieving circularity | |
| Questionnaire development, quantitative analysis | Lean Supply Chain, Agile Supply Chain, I4.0 base technologies | Results from Factor Analysis for I4.0 base technologies. Support for the view that dynamic capabilities could be generated through collaboration with SC partners | |
| A Systematic Literature Review followed the PRISMA 2020 procedure. The analysis methods included descriptive analysis and thematic synthesis. A structured interview with academicians and a Q-sort method with managers were used to validate the proposed maturity model | Disruptive Technologies, Infrastructure Practices, Transparency, Integration, Interoperability, Collaboration, Performance measurement, Efficiency, Flexibility, and Responsiveness, Environmental Performance Metrics | A four-stage Circular Economic-based SCQM 4.0 practice route (incidental, intentional, integrated, and optimized) for firms to adopt towards achieving a Circular Economy | |
| Comprehensive literature review | Integration of Industry 4.0 (I4.0) with SCQM for fostering sustainability in a circular economy (CE), including tools like IoT, blockchain, traceability, and smart packaging | Developed a comprehensive conceptual framework for SCQM4.0 aimed at achieving holistic sustainability objectives within a circular economy, encompassing economic, social, and environmental dimensions |
Sharing content requires targeting cookies to be enabled. Please update your cookie preferences to use this feature.