Table 2.

Reflective measurement model analysis

ConstructsItemsLoadings (>0.7)AVE
(>0.5)
CA (>0.7)CR
(>0.7)
Technological context (TEC)
(Religia et al., 2021; Wessels and Jokonya, 2022)
TEC1:CRM is easy to implement0.7670.6840.9090.928
TEC2:CRM is simple to operate0.831
TEC3:CRM offers marketing convenience0.819
TEC4:CRM boosts product sales0.863
TEC5:CRM meets business needs0.863
TEC6:CRM aligns with business processes0.815
Organizational Context (ORG) (Aligarh et al., 2023; Hassan et al., 2023)ORG1:Owner allocates resources for CRM0.8040.5780.8180.872
ORG2:Owner supports CRM use0.752
ORG3:Sufficient infrastructure for CRM0.784
ORG4:Adequate facilities for CRM0.801
ORG5:Competent staff for CRM0.701
Environmental Context (ENV) (Al-Hiyari et al., 2024; Amini and Jahanbakhsh, 2023)ENV1:Competitors use CRM0.7910.5780.8180.872
ENV2:CRM provides a competitive edge0.710
ENV3:CRM helps manage customer loyalty0.785
ENV4:Customers request promo updates0.733
ENV5:Customers need product info0.799
Digital leadership (DLE)
(Borah et al., 2022; Mihardjo et al., 2019; Mo et al., 2023)
DLE1:Clear ITC vision0.7270.6150.8460.888
DLE2:Committed to ITC integration0.860
DLE3:Encourages ITC innovation0.780
DLE4:Clear ITC strategy0.750
DLE5:Introduces CRM for customer data0.798
Adoption of CRM (AOC)
(Religia et al., 2023; Salah et al., 2021)
AOC1:CRM changes customer interaction0.9680.9400.9790.984
AOC2:Actively uses CRM for data0.973
AOC3:Actively uses CRM in service0.954
AOC4:Actively uses CRM for loyalty0.983

Note(s):

Loading = outer loading; AVE = average variance extracted; CA = Cronbach’s alpha; CR = composite reliability

Source(s): Software SmartPLS 3.0; table prepared by the authors

or Create an Account

Close subscription notice
Close access options