Table 4. Assessment of the structural... | Emerald Publishing

Table 4.

Assessment of the structural model

Hypotheses	Relations	Without controls*		With controls**		Results
Hypotheses	Relations	β	p-value	β	p-value	Results
H1	TEC → AOC	−0.126	0.085	−0.091	0.175	ns
H2	ORG → AOC	0.036	0.334	0.007	0.471	ns
H3	ENV → AOC	0.391	0.000	0.432	0.000	s
H4	DLE → AOC	0.336	0.000	0.302	0.000	s
H5	TEC × DLE → AOC	0.057	0.189	0.06	0.173	ns
H6	ORG × DLE → AOC	−0.151	0.004	−0.148	0.004	ns
Control variable
	Gender → AOC	–	–	−0.055	0.18	ns
	Age → AOC	–	–	0.077	0.134	ns
	Education → AOC	–	–	0.027	0.341	ns
	Operational → AOC	–	–	−0.048	0.229	ns

Hypotheses	Relations	Without controls*		With controls**		Results
Hypotheses	Relations	β	p-value	β	p-value	Results
H1	TEC → AOC	−0.126	0.085	−0.091	0.175	ns
H2	ORG → AOC	0.036	0.334	0.007	0.471	ns
H3	ENV → AOC	0.391	0.000	0.432	0.000	s
H4	DLE → AOC	0.336	0.000	0.302	0.000	s
H5	TEC × DLE → AOC	0.057	0.189	0.06	0.173	ns
H6	ORG × DLE → AOC	−0.151	0.004	−0.148	0.004	ns
Control variable
	Gender → AOC	–	–	−0.055	0.18	ns
	Age → AOC	–	–	0.077	0.134	ns
	Education → AOC	–	–	0.027	0.341	ns
	Operational → AOC	–	–	−0.048	0.229	ns

Note(s): *R² = 0.396; *Q² = 0,294; **R² = 0.357; **Q² = 0.302; p <0.05; ns = not supported; s = supported

Source(s): Software SmartPLS 3.0; table prepared by the authors