Table 3

Density (mean ± standard deviation) and porosity of the samples printed to analyse the influence of toolpath parameters (infill type, wall line count, and infill overlap)

SpecimenDensity (µ±σ ) [%]Porosity [%]
105%_Concentric (10)93.11 ± 1.666.89
105%_Concentric (10; 45°)91.65 ± 0.768.35
105%_Concentric (12)92.96 ± 5.357.04
105%_Lines (3W, 0.19)95.63 ± 2.874.37
105%_Lines (3W, 0.28)99.17 ± 0.860.83
105%_Lines (1W, 0.19)99.07 ± 1.140.93
105%_Lines (1W, 0.28)99.80 ± 0.260.20
105%_Lines (0W)90.32 ± 0.209.68
105%_Zig-zag (3W, 0.19)93.64 ± 1.426.36
105%_Zig-zag (3W, 0.28)97.96 ± 0.992.04
105%_Zig-zag (1W, 0.19)93.64 ± 1.356.36
105%_Zig-zag (1W, 0.28)96.94 ± 1.143.06
105%_Zig-zag (0W)95.72 ± 2.854.28
Notes:

For the sample labelling, see Figure 2. All samples were printed with the C profile, thus with a 105% infill (Table 2)

Source: Table by authors

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal