Table 1

Comparison of performance metrics between proposed and benchmark methods on the COD10K dataset. Only models with less than 50G Multiply-Accumulate Operations (MACs) were considered. The top-performing method for each metric on each dataset is highlighted in bold, while the second-best method is underscored.

ModelPub/YearInputsaFβwMEϕmnPara.MACs
SINet [10]CVPR’2035220.7760.6310.0430.86448.95M19.42G
C2FNet [32]IJCAF2135220.8130.6860.0360.89028.41M13.12G
TINet [48]AAAF2135220.7930.6350.0420.86128.56M8.58G
JSCOD [21]CVPR’2135220.8090.6840.0350.884121.63M25.20G
LSR [24]CVPR’2135220.8040.6730.0370.88057.90M25.21G
PFNet [28]CVPR’2141620.8000.6600.0400.87745.64M26.54G
C2FNet-V2 [1]TCSVT’2235220.8110.6910.0360.88744.94M18.10G
ERRNet [16]PR’2235220.7860.6300.0430.86769.76M20.05G
TPRNet [44]TVC J’2235220.8170.6830.0360.88732.95M12.98G
FAPNet [46]TIP’2235220.8220.6940.0360.88829.52M29.69G
BSANet [47]AAAI’2238420.8180.6990.0340.89132.58M29.70G
SegMaR [17]CVPR’2235220.8330.7240.0340.89956.21M33.63G
SINetV2 [8]TPAMI’2235220.8150.6800.0370.88726.98M12.28G
CRNet [13]AAAI’2332020.7330.5760.0490.83232.65M11.83G
DGNet-S [15]MIR’2335220.8100.6720.0360.8887.02M2.77G
DGNet [15]MIR’2335220.8220.6930.0330.89619.22M1.20G
GreenCOD-D3-1000-67220.7970.7010.0330.88116.83M13.70G
GreenCOD-D3-10000-67220.8070.7150.0320.89317.62M15.06G
GreenCOD-D6-1000-67220.8040.7090.0320.89117.50M13.78G
GreenCOD-D6-10000-67220.8130.7240.0310.89524.34M16.22G

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal