Table 2

Comparison of performance metrics between proposed and benchmark methods on the COD10K dataset. Only models with more than 50G Multiply-Accumulate Operations (MACs) were considered. The top-performing method for each metric on each dataset is highlighted in bold, while the second-best method is underscored.

ModelPub/YearInputsaFβwMEϕmnPara.MACs
D2CNet [34]TIE’2132020.8070.6800.0370.876--
R-MGL [39]CVPR’2147320.8140.6660.0350.85267.64M249.89G
S-MGL [39]CVPR’2147320.8110.6550.0370.84563.60M236.60G
UGTR [36]ICCV’2147320.8180.6670.0350.85348.87M127.12G
BAS [30]arXiv’2128820.8020.6770.0380.85587.06M161.19G
NCHIT [40]CVIU’2228820.7920.5910.0460.819--
CubeNet [52]PR’2235220.7950.6430.0410.865--
OCENet [23]WACV’2248020.8270.7070.0330.89460.31M59.70G
BGNet [33]IJCAF2241620.8310.7220.0330.90179.85M58.45G
PreyNet [43]MM’2244820.8130.6970.0340.88138.53M58.10G
ZoomNet [29]CVPR’2238420.8380.7290.0290.91932.38M95.50G
FDNet [45]CVPR’2241620.8400.7290.0300.919--
CamoFormer-C [38]arXiv’2338420.8600.7700.0240.92696.69M50.77G
CamoFormer-R [38]arXiv’2338420.8380.7240.0290.91654.25M78.85G
PopNet [35]arXiv’2351220.8510.7570.0280.910188.05M154.88G
PFNet+ [27]SCIS’2348020.8060.6770.0370.884--
GreenCOD-D3-1000-67220.7970.7010.0330.88116.83M13.70G
GreenCOD-D3-10000-67220.8070.7150.0320.89317.62M15.06G
GreenCOD-D6-1000-67220.8040.7090.0320.89117.50M13.78G
GreenCOD-D6-10000-67220.8130.7240.0310.89524.34M16.22G

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal